Literature DB >> 7205165

Screening for colorectal cancer.

A K Diehl.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer remains a major cause of mortality in the United States. Of all persons diagnosed with this tumor, less than 50 percent survive five years. Useful preventive measures have not been established. Screening programs, however, offer the prospect of detecting cancers early in their course, when the prognosis for survival is more favorable. To date, no screening test has clearly demonstrated its effectiveness in reducing mortality from colorectal cancer. Periodic rigid sigmoidoscopy and stool occult blood testing have gained many advocates, but have yet to be proved worthwhile in adequately controlled clinical trials. Uncontrolled studies indicate that both these techniques discover approximately 2 cancers per 1000 screenees. There is suggestive evidence that the cancers discovered are more likely to be localized. For the present, physicians should limit colorectal cancer screening to persons at relatively high risk: persons aged over 45 years, with a family history of bowel cancer, or with polyps. Protocols should be designed to ensure high specificity. The recommendations of the National Cancer Institute's consensus conference provide practical guidelines pending the outcome of randomized controlled trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7205165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  6 in total

1.  Screening for carcinoma of the colon: a family practice perspective.

Authors:  J F Sangster; T M Gerace
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Routine hemoccult screening: the current evidence.

Authors:  J W Frank
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Prevention in family practice: Consensus statement from the front line.

Authors:  G Satenstein; J Lemelin; C Folkerson; K A Scott; W E Hogg
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Diagnostic testing in family practice.

Authors:  R V Birtwhistle
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 5.  Colorectal carcinoma and Haemoccult. A study of its value in mass screening using meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Windeler; J Köbberling
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Does screening proctosigmoidoscopy result in reduced mortality from colorectal cancer? A critical review of the literature.

Authors:  C L Ow; H J Lemar; M J Weaver
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.