Literature DB >> 7204494

Nonrandom chromosome segregation in Neocurtilla (Gryllotalpa) hexadactyla: an ultrastructural study.

D F Kubai, D Wise.   

Abstract

During meiosis I in males of the mole cricket Neocurtilla (Gryllotalpa) hexadactyla, the univalent X1 chromosome and the heteromorphic X2Y chromosome pair segregate nonrandomly; the X1 and X2 chromosomes move to the same pole in anaphase. By means of ultrastructural analysis of serial sections of cells in several stages of meiosis I, metaphase of meiosis II, and mitosis, we found that the kinetochore region of two of the three nonrandomly segregating chromosomes differ from autosomal kinetochores only during meiosis I. The distinction is most pronounced at metaphase I when massive aggregates of electron-dense substance mark the kinetochores of X1 and Y chromosomes. The lateral position of the kinetochores of X1 and Y chromosomes and the association of these chromosomes with microtubules running toward both poles are also characteristic of meiosis I and further distinguish X1 and Y from the autosomes. Nonrandomly segregating chromosomes are typically positioned within the spindle so that the kinetochoric sides of the X2Y pair and the X1 chromosome are both turned toward the same interpolar spindle axis. This spatial relationship may be a result of a linkage of X1 and Y chromosomes lying in opposite half spindles via a small bundle of microtubules that runs between their unusual kinetochores. Thus, nonrandom segregation in Neocurtilla hexadactyla involves a unique modification at the kinetochores of particular chromosomes, which presumably affects the manner in which these chromosomes are integrated within the spindle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7204494      PMCID: PMC2111755          DOI: 10.1083/jcb.88.2.281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biol        ISSN: 0021-9525            Impact factor:   10.539


  9 in total

1.  [Electron microscopic study on plasmas containing desoxyribonucleic acid. I. Nucleoids of actively growing bacteria].

Authors:  A RYTER; E KELLENBERGER; A BIRCHANDERSEN; O MAALOE
Journal:  Z Naturforsch B       Date:  1958-09       Impact factor: 1.047

2.  Cytogenetics of orthopteroid insects.

Authors:  M J D WHITE
Journal:  Adv Genet       Date:  1951       Impact factor: 1.944

Review 3.  Ultrastructure of the mitotic spindle.

Authors:  H Fuge
Journal:  Int Rev Cytol Suppl       Date:  1977

4.  [Structure and function of the spindle apparatus].

Authors:  R Dietz
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1969-05

5.  The non-random chromosome segregation in spermatocytes of Gryllotalpa hexadactyla. A micromanipulation analysis.

Authors:  R Camenzind; R B Micklas
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1968       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Purification and quantitation of glutaraldehyde and its effect on several enzyme activities in skeletal muscle.

Authors:  P J Anderson
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 2.479

7.  Distribution of nuclear pores and perinuclear dense substances in spermatocytes I of some Oedionychina fleabeetles.

Authors:  N Virkki; M Kimura
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 8.  Mitosis.

Authors:  R B Nicklas
Journal:  Adv Cell Biol       Date:  1971

9.  Electron microscopy of spermatocytes previously studied in life: methods and some observations on micromanipulated chromosomes.

Authors:  R B Nicklas; B R Brinkley; D A Pepper; D F Kubai; G K Rickards
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 5.285

  9 in total
  10 in total

1.  Inter-chromosomal level of genome organization and longevity-related phenotypes in humans.

Authors:  Alexander M Kulminski; Irina Culminskaya; Anatoli I Yashin
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2012-01-27

2.  Centromeric dots in crane-fly spermatocytes: meiotic maturation and malorientation.

Authors:  M A Janicke; J R LaFountain
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Meiosis in Mesostoma ehrenbergii ehrenbergii (Turbellaria, Rhabdocoela). III. Univalent chromosome segregation during the first meiotic division in spermatocytes.

Authors:  H A Oakley
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  The ultrastructure of an intraspindle membrane system in meiosis of spider spermatocytes.

Authors:  D Wise
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Coordinated Action of Biological Processes during Embryogenesis Can Cause Genome-Wide Linkage Disequilibrium in the Human Genome and Influence Age-Related Phenotypes.

Authors:  Irina Culminskaya; Alexander M Kulminski; Anatoli I Yashin
Journal:  Ann Gerontol Geriatr Res       Date:  2016-05-04

6.  Meiosis in Sciara coprophila: structure of the spindle and chromosome behavior during the first meiotic division.

Authors:  D F Kubai
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 10.539

7.  Malorientation in half-bivalents at anaphase: analysis of autosomal laggards in untreated, cold-treated, and cold-recovering crane fly spermatocytes.

Authors:  M A Janicke; J R LaFountain
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Nonrandom chromosome arrangements in germ line nuclei of Sciara coprophila males: the basis for nonrandom chromosome segregation on the meiosis I spindle.

Authors:  D F Kubai
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Spindle microtubules and their mechanical associations after micromanipulation in anaphase.

Authors:  R B Nicklas; D F Kubai; T S Hays
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 10.  Chromosome interaction over a distance in meiosis.

Authors:  Mary Brady; Leocadia V Paliulis
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.963

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.