Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 A putative role for eosinophils in tick rejection.

Literature DB >> 7202667

A putative role for eosinophils in tick rejection.

Abstract

In the reaction of Bos taurus cattle to infestation by the tick Boophilus microplus, mast cell histamine is translocated by the eosinophils to the attachment site. The concentration pattern of this cutaneous mediator for pain appears related to the grooming behaviour of the host.

Entities: Chemical Disease

Mesh：

Substances：
Histamine

Year: 1981 PMID： 7202667 DOI： 10.1007/bf01965562

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Experientia ISSN： 0014-4754

14 in total

1. Eosinophils as mediators of antibody-dependent damage to schistosomula.

Authors: A E Butterworth; R F Sturrock; V Houba; A A Mahmoud; A Sher; P H Rees
Journal: Nature Date: 1975-08-28 Impact factor: 49.962

2. Boophilus microplus: the effect of host resistance on larval attachments and growth.

Authors: D H Kemp; D Koudstaal; J A Roberts; J D Kerr
Journal: Parasitology Date: 1976-08 Impact factor: 3.234

3. Boophilus microplus: antihistaminic and tranquillizing drugs and cattle resistance.

Authors: R J Tatchell; G F Bennett
Journal: Exp Parasitol Date: 1969-12 Impact factor: 2.011

4. Tick resistance: basophils in skin reactions of resistant guinea pigs.

Authors: J R Allen
Journal: Int J Parasitol Date: 1973-03 Impact factor: 3.981

5. Histamine blocking agent in the salivary gland homogenate of the tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus sanguineus.

Authors: W A Chinery; E Ayitey-Smith
Journal: Nature Date: 1977-01-27 Impact factor: 49.962

6. Ultrastructural evidence for complement and antibody-dependent damage to schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni by rat eosinophils in vitro.

Authors: D J McLaren; F J Ramalho-Pinto; S R Smithers
Journal: Parasitology Date: 1978-12 Impact factor: 3.234

7. Induction of fluorescence in histamine-containing cells.

Authors: B Ehinger; R Thunberg
Journal: Exp Cell Res Date: 1967-08 Impact factor: 3.905

8. Boophilus microplus: cellular responses to larval attachment and their relationship to host resistance.

Authors: A V Schleger; D T Lincoln; R V McKenna; D H Kemp; J A Roberts
Journal: Aust J Biol Sci Date: 1976-12

9. The relation between skin histamine concentration, histamine sensitivity, and the resistance of cattle to the tick, Boophilus microplus.

Authors: P Willadsen; G M Wood; G A Riding
Journal: Z Parasitenkd Date: 1979-06-13

10. A role for the eosinophil in acquired resistance to Schistosoma mansoni infection as determined by antieosinophil serum.

Authors: A A Mahmoud; K S Warren; P A Peters
Journal: J Exp Med Date: 1975-10-01 Impact factor: 14.307

5 in total

1. Immunological responses of the rabbit host to infestation by the brown ear-tick Rhipicephalus appendiculatus (Acarina:Ixodidae).

Authors: B H Fivaz
Journal: Exp Appl Acarol Date: 1990-10 Impact factor: 2.132

2. Cellular responses to Rhipicephalus microplus infestations in pre-sensitised cattle with differing phenotypes of infestation.

Authors: Munyaradzi C Marufu; Kennedy Dzama; Michael Chimonyo
Journal: Exp Appl Acarol Date: 2013-09-22 Impact factor: 2.132