Literature DB >> 7201758

Comparative cardiovascular effects of midazolam and thiopental in healthy patients.

P W Lebowitz, M E Cote, A L Daniels, F M Ramsey, J A Martyn, R S Teplick, J K Davison.   

Abstract

Midazolam, a water-soluble benzodiazepine that is shorter-acting, more potent, and less irritating to veins than diazepam, has been suggested for use for induction of anesthesia. The cardiovascular effects of an induction-sized dose (0.25 mg/kg) of midazolam in A.S.A. class I or II surgical patients (N = 11) sedated with morphine and N2O-O2 were compared in a double-blind fashion with a similar group of patients (N = 9) receiving thiopental (4.0 mg/kg). Consistent with earlier studies, patients given thiopental experienced downward trends from base line in mean arterial pressure, stroke volume, cardiac output, and heart rate; mean right atrial pressure increased slightly, whereas systemic vascular resistance did not change. Induction of anesthesia with midazolam was associated with more gradual and less pronounced hemodynamic alteration; the only significant changes from base line were decreases in mean arterial pressure 5 and 10 minutes after injection. When the two groups were compared, no significant differences were found. Midazolam is, then, as acceptable for induction of anesthesia as thiopental from a hemodynamic point of view in A.S.A. class I and II patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7201758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  11 in total

1.  Respiratory and cardiovascular effects in relation to plasma levels of midazolam and diazepam.

Authors:  M Sunzel; L Paalzow; L Berggren; I Eriksson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Cardiovascular effects of intravenous midazolam after open heart surgery.

Authors:  L Shekerdemian; A Bush; A Redington
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Cardiovascular effects of midazolam and thiopentone for induction of anaesthesia in ill surgical patients.

Authors:  P W Lebowitz; M E Cote; A L Daniels; J A Martyn; R S Teplick; J K Davison; N Sunder
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1983-01

4.  Evaluation of the anxiolytic and amnestic effects of diazepam and midazolam for minor oral surgery.

Authors:  N H Luyk; M A Boyle; R P Ward-Booth
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr

5.  Premedication with intramuscular midazolam: effect on induction time with intravenous midazolam compared to intravenous thiopentone or ketamine.

Authors:  A A Artru; M S Dhamee; A B Seifen
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1984-07

Review 6.  New intravenous anaesthetics and neuromuscular blocking drugs. A review of their properties and clinical use.

Authors:  C S Reilly; W S Nimmo
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of the newer intravenous anaesthetic agents.

Authors:  P J Davis; D R Cook
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1986 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  Adverse effects of general anaesthetics.

Authors:  M C Berthoud; C S Reilly
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 9.  Midazolam. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use.

Authors:  J W Dundee; N J Halliday; K W Harper; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Arousal time from sedation during spinal anaesthesia for elective infraumbilical surgeries: Comparison between propofol and midazolam.

Authors:  Dipanjan Bagchi; Mohan Chandra Mandal; Sekhar Ranjan Basu
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2014-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.