| Literature DB >> 7200963 |
Abstract
This paper analyzes four areas in which reproductive freedom is being denied to women. The first area involves the use of sterilization without adequate counseling as to the risk of reversibility of the method or when it is made a precondition for performing an abortion. The second concerns the sterilization technique chosen, especially in developing countries, and the failure of international population agencies to note the higher complication rates of certain procedures. The third involves the inadequate information provided to women about the side-effects of the controversial injectable contraceptive, Depo-Provera. The fourth area concerns the unethical marketing of the Dalkon Shield device. It is concluded that physicians have a responsibility to avoid allowing authoritarian attitudes or racial, class, or sex prejudices to influence their treatment of women.Entities:
Keywords: Dalkon Shield; Genetics and Reproduction; National Health Service; Abortion, Induced; Contraception; Contraceptive Agents; Contraceptive Agents, Female; Contraceptive Agents, Progestin; Contraceptive Methods; Counseling; Depo-provera; Economic Factors; Ethics; Family Planning; Female Sterilization; Fertility Control, Postconception; Gynecologic Surgery; Iud; Iud, Unmedicated; Medroxyprogesterone Acetate; Philosophical Overview; Research Report; Reversibility; Socioeconomic Factors; Sterilization, Sexual; Surgery; Treatment; Urogenital Surgery; Women's Status
Mesh:
Year: 1982 PMID: 7200963 DOI: 10.2190/L97B-U73E-EHE2-LHHG
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Health Serv ISSN: 0020-7314 Impact factor: 1.663