Literature DB >> 7200851

Bone mass of the axial and the appendicular skeleton in women with Colles' fracture: its relation to physical activity.

B Krølner, E Tøndevold, B Toft, B Berthelsen, S P Nielsen.   

Abstract

The aim of this investigation was to elucidate whether Colles' fractures in middle-aged women were indicative of generalized bone loss (osteopenia) and whether bone mass of the axial and the appendicular skeleton was related to the extent of daily physical activity. Thirty-six patients (aged 50-73 years) with previous Colles' fracture were studied. The median time elapse after the injury was 18 months (range 9-20.5 months). Bone mineral content of the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th lumbar vertebrae (lumbar BMC) and both distal forearms (forearm BMC) were determined to dual-photon (153Gd) absorptiometry. The physical activity level was graded according to a standard interview and a bicycle ergometer test. Mean lumbar BMC was reduced by 9% compared to age-matched normal women (p less than 0.05), mean forearm BMC was reduced by 5% (NS). Twenty patients showed spinal osteopenia by either conventional radiography or absorptiometry (95% confidence limits 38-72%). The fracture-related bone loss from the forearms was most prominent when the fracture had occurred in the dominant forearm, suggesting that the loss of 'dominant' forearm activity per se results in bone loss. No relation between working capacity and forearm BMC was found. However, the working capacity was positively related to lumbar BMC (P less than 0.01), even if the common relationship to age was eliminated (P less than 0.05). The data suggest that the bone mass of the axial skeleton reflects the extent of daily physical activity. Patients with Colles' fractures represent an easily definable population which might benefit from prophylactic measures against vertebral bone loss and compression fractures. One of these could be physical exercise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7200851     DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-097x.1982.tb00017.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Physiol        ISSN: 0144-5979


  15 in total

1.  Unequal decrease in bone density of lumbar spine and ultradistal radius in Colles' and vertebral fracture syndromes.

Authors:  R Eastell; H W Wahner; W M O'Fallon; P C Amadio; L J Melton; B L Riggs
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Hip fractures, preceding distal radius fractures and screening for osteoporosis: should we be screening earlier? A minimum 10-year retrospective cohort study at a single centre.

Authors:  Z J Daruwalla; S S Huq; K L Wong; P Y Nee; K M Leong; K R Pillay; D P Murphy
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  The effects of muscle-building exercise on bone mineral density of the radius, spine, and hip in young men.

Authors:  L A Colletti; J Edwards; L Gordon; J Shary; N H Bell
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Physical fitness is a major determinant of femoral neck and lumbar spine bone mineral density.

Authors:  N A Pocock; J A Eisman; M G Yeates; P N Sambrook; S Eberl
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Value of resistance training for the reduction of sports injuries.

Authors:  S J Fleck; J E Falkel
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1986 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Is bone mineral density advantage maintained long-term in previous weight lifters?

Authors:  M K Karlsson; O Johnell; K J Obrant
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Bone mineral density in weight lifters.

Authors:  M K Karlsson; O Johnell; K J Obrant
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Cortical versus trabecular bone mass: influence of activity on both bone components.

Authors:  H Rico; J González-Riola; M Revilla; L F Villa; F Gómez-Castresana; J Escribano
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Peak bone mass and osteoporosis prevention.

Authors:  J A Eisman; P J Kelly; N A Morrison; N A Pocock; R Yeoman; J Birmingham; P N Sambrook
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Can vigorous exercise play a role in osteoporosis prevention? A review.

Authors:  B Gutin; M J Kasper
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.