Literature DB >> 7200850

Osteoporosis and normality: how to express the bone mineral content of lumbar vertebrae.

B Krølner.   

Abstract

Bone mineral content of the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th lumbar vertebrae (lumbar BMC) was measured in 70 normal women (aged 19-88 years) and 72 post-menopausal women (aged 58-89 years) with primary osteoporosis using dual-photon (153Gd) absorptiometry. The inter-individual variation of lumbar BMC was 26.7% in normal women. This figure could be reduced to 13.9%, if lumbar BMC was normalized to age (or years after the menopause), body height, body weight, and vertebral size according to multiple regression analysis. The reduction thus obtained of the inter-individual variation in normal post-menopausal women was statistically insignificant, however, and it appeared that other variables were of importance as the lumbar BMC of older women. Mean lumbar BMC of the osteoporotic women was 41% lower than that of normal pre-menopausal women. The separation between normal and osteoporotic individuals became less clear, if lumbar BMC was normalized as mentioned. The data suggest that spinal osteoporosis is predominantly a condition of normal small old women with diminutive vertebrae and early menopause. It is recommended that lumbar BMC is expressed as the total mineral mass of the bones measured, the normal range being BMC of health pre-menopausal women. Normalization to age, body height, body weight, and vertebral size seems rather speculative.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7200850     DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-097x.1982.tb00016.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Physiol        ISSN: 0144-5979


  5 in total

1.  Bone densitometry of excised vertebrae; anatomical relationships.

Authors:  R B Mazess; P Pedersen; J Vetter; H S Barden
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Bone density of the radius, spine, and hip in relation to percent of ideal body weight in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  B Dawson-Hughes; C Shipp; L Sadowski; G Dallal
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  A critical review of bone mass and the risk of fractures in osteoporosis.

Authors:  P D Ross; J W Davis; J M Vogel; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Interpretation of lumbar spine densitometry in women with fractures.

Authors:  S P Nielsen; F Hermansen; O Bärenholdt
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Vertebral dimensions as risk factor of vertebral fracture in osteoporotic patients: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  A Ruyssen-Witrand; L Gossec; S Kolta; M Dougados; C Roux
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 4.507

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.