Literature DB >> 7192748

Urodynamic norms in women. I. Normals versus stress incontinents.

M R Bottaccini, D M Gleason.   

Abstract

Urodynamic statistics for normal women were compared to similar norms for stress incontinent women. It was concluded that 1) the reduction of flow rate in stress incontinent patients appears to be the result, with high probability of pathologic changes in the function of the distal urethra, 2) stress incontinence does not affect the combined effects of bladder pressure and the proximal urethral resistance during voiding as reflected in velocity, 3) the distal urethral cross-sectional area appears to be under neuromuscular control and 4) the distal urethra of stress incontinent women appears to be incapable of opening as widely as the distal urethra of normal women. It is not currently possible to assign anatomical or physiological causes to the observed phenomena.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7192748     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)55601-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  3 in total

1.  Uroflowmetry: its current clinical utility for women.

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen; Vivian Yang; Vanessa Logan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-04-22

Review 2.  Uroflow in women: an overview and suggestions for the future.

Authors:  J B Jørgensen; H Colstrup; C Frimodt-Møller
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1998

3.  A normal flow pattern in women does not exclude voiding pathology.

Authors:  Elisabeth Pauwels; Stefan De Wachter; Jean-Jacques Wyndaele
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-09-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.