Literature DB >> 7191799

Towards an objective assessment of the "maximal voluntary contraction" component in routine muscle strength measurements.

K H Kroemer, W S Marras.   

Abstract

Routine measurements of muscle strength capabilities commonly use external dynamometers against which the subject exerts maximal voluntary contractions of muscles in static (isometric) tests. These tests require active cooperation of the subject, i.e., full motivation to "give the best". At present, no practicable techniques exist that provide objective clues indicating that indeed a maximal effort is delivered, or if only a portion of the available strength is exerted. This paper describes experiments performed with 30 subjects which indicate that the rate of strength build-up in repeated exertions may provide objective criteria to judge whether or not a subject exerts full muscular strength in a routine test.

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7191799     DOI: 10.1007/bf00421195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol        ISSN: 0301-5548


  6 in total

1.  [Is the evaluation of strength measurement in expert testimony reasonable?].

Authors:  W BECK; T HETTINGER
Journal:  Monatsschr Unfallheilkd Versicherungsmed       Date:  1956-04

2.  Motor unit differentiation and integrated surface EMG in voluntary isometric contraction.

Authors:  B Maton
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1976-06-21

3.  Endurance of muscle contraction under hypnosis.

Authors:  J Hyvärinen; P V Komi; P Puhakka
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1977-08

Review 4.  Regulation of stiffness by skeletomotor reflexes.

Authors:  J C Houk
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 19.318

5.  A proposed standard procedure for static muscle strength testing.

Authors:  L S Caldwell; D B Chaffin; F N Dukes-Dobos; K H Kroemer; L L Laubach; S H Snook; D E Wasserman
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1974-04

6.  Human strength: terminology, measurement, and interpretation of data.

Authors:  K H Kroemer
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 2.888

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  Postoperative muscle strength.

Authors:  J McCue; D Newham
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Maximal inspiratory pressure: does reproducibility indicate full effort?

Authors:  T K Aldrich; P Spiro
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Muscular fatigue patterning in power grip assessment.

Authors:  L D Robertson; C M Mullinax; G R Brodowicz; A R Swafford
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1996-03

4.  Reliability of isometric subtalar pronator and supinator strength testing.

Authors:  Marco Hagen; Matthias Lahner; Martin Winhuysen; Christian Maiwald
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Determining Sincerity of Effort Based on Grip Strength Test in Three Wrist Positions.

Authors:  Petcharatana Bhuanantanondh; Pirun Nanta; Keerin Mekhora
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2017-06-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.