Literature DB >> 719179

Influence of environmental factors excluding ultra violet radiation on the incidence of skin cancer.

J D Everall, P M Dowd.   

Abstract

Cancers of the skin are not properly registered and our lack of precise knowledge of the influence of environmental factors is due both to a failure to report and a failure to attribute because many tumours are not recognised as due to environmental factors and escape notification due to lack of knowledge and teaching. The long latent period also interferes. The commonest cancer is squamous cell carcinoma followed by basal cell carcinoma. Melanoma is exceedingly rarely environmental. The main causative agents are: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), inorganic arsenic and ionising radiation. PAH induce 4 times more cancer of the scrotum in workers using cutting oils or pitch than expected. These subjects have also increased incidence of second primaries of both the skin and internal organs. The latent period varies from 20 years (exposure to coal tar) to 50 years or more (exposure to mineral oils). Exposure to pitch may result in 11 fold increase incidence of squamous cell carcinoma. Skin cancer due to arsenic is rare. It has been seen in sheep dip workers, in patients treated with Fowler's solution and in vineyard workers using arsenical pesticides and drinking contaminated wine. The latent period may go up to 60 years. Ionising radiation over 1,000 rems may cause basal and squamous cell carcinoma. The latent period varies from 7 weeks to 56 years (average 25--30 yrs).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 719179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Cancer        ISSN: 0007-4551            Impact factor:   1.276


  8 in total

1.  Exposures and cancer incidence near oil fields in the Amazon basin of Ecuador.

Authors:  M San Sebastián; B Armstrong; J A Córdoba; C Stephens
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Immunoprevention of chemical carcinogenesis through early recognition of oncogene mutations.

Authors:  Tahseen H Nasti; Kyle J Rudemiller; J Barry Cochran; Hee Kyung Kim; Yuko Tsuruta; Naomi S Fineberg; Mohammad Athar; Craig A Elmets; Laura Timares
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  Further evidence against a direct genotoxic mode of action for arsenic-induced cancer.

Authors:  Catherine B Klein; Joanna Leszczynska; Christina Hickey; Toby G Rossman
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 4.219

4.  Case report 809: Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin invading the shoulder.

Authors:  N Hiller; D Fisher; S Gottschalk-Sabag; M Fried
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  Acute and chronic arsenic toxicity.

Authors:  R N Ratnaike
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  The role of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adducts in inducing mutations in mouse skin.

Authors:  Dhrubajyoti Chakravarti; Divya Venugopal; Paula C Mailander; Jane L Meza; Sheila Higginbotham; Ercole L Cavalieri; Eleanor G Rogan
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  Genotoxicity studies performed in the ecuadorian population.

Authors:  César Paz-Y-Miño; Nadia Cumbal; María Eugenia Sánchez
Journal:  Mol Biol Int       Date:  2012-02-16

8.  Human polyomaviruses and incidence of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in the New Hampshire skin cancer study.

Authors:  Anala Gossai; Tim Waterboer; Anne G Hoen; Shohreh F Farzan; Heather H Nelson; Angelika Michel; Martina Willhauck-Fleckenstein; Brock C Christensen; Ann E Perry; Michael Pawlita; Margaret R Karagas
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-02-21       Impact factor: 4.452

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.