Literature DB >> 7183335

Effects of cell motility and chemotaxis on microbial population growth.

D Lauffenburger, R Aris, K Keller.   

Abstract

A mathematical model is developed to elucidate the effects of biophysical transport processes (nutrient diffusion, cell motility, and chemotaxis) along with biochemical reaction processes (cell growth and death, nutrient uptake) upon steady-state bacterial population growth in a finite one-dimensional region. The particular situation considered is that of growth limitation by a nutrient diffusing from an adjacent phase not accessible to the bacteria. It is demonstrated that the cell motility and chemotaxis properties can have great influence on steady-state population size. In fact, motility effects can be as significant as growth kinetic effects, in a manner analogous to diffusion- and reaction-limited regimes in chemically reacting systems. In particular, the following conclusions can be drawn from our analysis for bacterial populations growing at steady-state in a confined, unmixed region: (a) Random motility may lead to decreased population density; (b) chemotaxis can allow increased population density if the chemotactic response is large enough; (c) a species with superior motility properties can outgrow a species with superior growth kinetic properties; (d) motility effects become greater as the size of the confined growth region increases; and (e) motility effects are diminished by significant mass-transfer limitation of the nutrient from the adjacent source phase. The relationships of these results for populations to previous conclusions for individual cells is discussed, and implications for microbial competition are suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7183335      PMCID: PMC1328997          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(82)84476-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  18 in total

1.  Model for the chemotactic response of a bacterial population.

Authors:  I R Lapidus; R Schiller
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Common mechanism for repellents and attractants in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  N Tsang; R Macnab; D E Koshland
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-07-06       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Model for chemotaxis.

Authors:  E F Keller; L A Segel
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Model for continuous culture which considers the viability concept.

Authors:  C G Sinclair; H H Topiwala
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Studies on negative chemotaxis and the survival value of motility in Pseudomonas fluorescens.

Authors:  J L Smith; R N Doetsch
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1969-03

6.  Survival value of chemotaxis in mixed cultures.

Authors:  W K Pilgram; F D Williams
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Chemotactic responses by motile bacteria.

Authors:  F W Seymour; R N Doetsch
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1973-10

8.  Traveling waves in a simple population model involving growth and death.

Authors:  C R Kennedy; R Aris
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.758

9.  Role of chemotaxis in the association of motile bacteria with intestinal mucosa: in vivo studies.

Authors:  R Freter; P C O'Brien; M S Macsai
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  Selective outgrowth of fimbriate bacteria in static liquid medium.

Authors:  D C Old; J P Duguid
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  12 in total

1.  Quantification of chemotaxis to naphthalene by Pseudomonas putida G7.

Authors:  R B Marx; M D Aitken
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Analysis of chemotactic bacterial distributions in population migration assays using a mathematical model applicable to steep or shallow attractant gradients.

Authors:  R M Ford; D A Lauffenburger
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.758

3.  Effects of random motility on growth of bacterial populations.

Authors:  D Lauffenburger; R Aris; K H Keller
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Stopped-flow chamber and image analysis system for quantitative characterization of bacterial population migration: Motility and chemotaxis ofEscherichia coli K12 to fucose.

Authors:  R M Ford; B R Phillips; J A Quinn; D A Lauffenburger
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Quantitative studies of bacterial chemotaxis and microbial population dynamics.

Authors:  D A Lauffenburger
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Effect of bacterial chemotaxis on dynamics of microbial competition.

Authors:  F X Kelly; K J Dapsis; D A Lauffenburger
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.552

7.  Adaptive Strategies of Bacillus thuringiensis Isolated from Acid Mine Drainage Site in Sabah, Malaysia.

Authors:  Low Yi Yik; Grace Joy Wei Lie Chin; Cahyo Budiman; Collin Glenn Joseph; Baba Musta; Kenneth Francis Rodrigues
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 2.461

8.  Role of chemotaxis in the ecology of denitrifiers.

Authors:  M J Kennedy; J G Lawless
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Chemotaxis toward Nitrogenous Compounds by Swimming Strains of Marine Synechococcus spp.

Authors:  J M Willey; J B Waterbury
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 10.  Ecology and physics of bacterial chemotaxis in the ocean.

Authors:  Roman Stocker; Justin R Seymour
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 11.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.