Literature DB >> 7182801

Metacontrast U-shaped functions derive from two monotonic processes.

A Reeves.   

Abstract

Different underlying processes account for the descending and ascending portions of the metacontrast U-shaped function obtained in the flanking-masks paradigm. One or another process is dominant on each trial. Each process is monotonic with stimulus onset asynchrony in the region in which it can be measured. The two processes may be isolated by asking the subject to report on each trial not only target visibility but also whether target and mask appear simultaneous or not. Standard U-shaped functions could be obtained only as an artifact of averaging across these different types of trials.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7182801     DOI: 10.1068/p110415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  6 in total

1.  Perceptual latency priming: a measure of attentional facilitation.

Authors:  Ingrid Scharlau
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-04-26

2.  An analysis of visual masking, with a defense of 'Stopped Processing'.

Authors:  Adam Reeves
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

3.  Temporal processes in prime-mask interaction: Assessing perceptual consequences of masked information.

Authors:  Ingrid Scharlau
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

4.  Metacontrast masking and the cortical representation of surface color: dynamical aspects of edge integration and contrast gain control.

Authors:  Michael E Rudd
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

5.  What should a quantitative model of masking look like and why would we want it?

Authors:  Gregory Francis
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

6.  The effects of spatial and temporal cueing on metacontrast masking.

Authors:  Maximilian Bruchmann; Philipp Hintze; Simon Mota
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-12-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.