Literature DB >> 7182798

The interpretation of stereo-disparity information: the computation of surface orientation and depth.

J Mayhew.   

Abstract

Two methods for interpreting disparity information are described. Neither requires extraretinal information to scale for distance: one method uses horizontal disparities to solve for the viewing distance, the other uses the vertical disparities. Method 1 requires the assumption that the disparities derive from a locally planar surface. Then from the horizontal disparities measured at four retinal locations the viewing distance and the equation of local surface 'patch' can be obtained. Method 2 does not need this assumption. The vertical disparities are first used to obtain the values of the gaze and viewing distance. These are then used to interpret the horizontal disparity information. An algorithm implementing the methods has been tested and is found to be subject to a perceptual phenomenon known as the 'induced effect'.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7182798     DOI: 10.1068/p110387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  6 in total

1.  Development and verification of a snapshot dental intraoral three-dimensional scanner based on chromatic confocal imaging.

Authors:  Michael Zint; Karl Stock; Daniel Claus; Rainer Graser; Raimund Hibst
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-07-12

2.  An ecological analysis of binocular vision.

Authors:  C F Michaels
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1986

3.  Size constancy, depth constancy and vertical disparities: a further quantitative interpretation.

Authors:  P O Bishop
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.086

4.  Stereoscopic depth perception at far viewing distances.

Authors:  R H Cormack
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-05

5.  Effect of vertical disparities on depth representation in macaque monkeys: MT physiology and behavior.

Authors:  Syed A Chowdhury; Daniel L Christiansen; Michael L Morgan; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Latitude and longitude vertical disparities.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Graeme P Phillipson; Andrew Glennerster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.