Literature DB >> 7182703

The measurement of patients' values in medicine.

H Llewellyn-Thomas, H J Sutherland, R Tibshirani, A Ciampi, J E Till, N F Boyd.   

Abstract

The standard gamble, derived from decision theory, is considered a criterion method for obtaining patients' values for different health states. In this method, a rater's value for a health state is obtained by determining, in a hypothetical setting, his readiness to remain in that state or take a risky choice with different outcomes of known value. According to the expected utility criterion, a rater's utility or value for a particular state should not be influenced by changes in the gamble outcomes. The standard gamble was used to obtain 64 patients' judgments of a set of health states, first with the outcomes of perfect health or death, and subsequently with other health states as outcomes. The changes in gamble outcomes significantly influenced reported values for health states, indicating that the standard gamble is internally inconsistent. This observation poses a major limitation to its use as a value measurement method in medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7182703     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8200200407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  28 in total

Review 1.  Benefit valuation in economic evaluation of cancer therapies. A systematic review of the published literature.

Authors:  J Brown; M Sculpher
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Valuing health-related quality of life. A review of health state valuation techniques.

Authors:  C Green; J Brazier; M Deverill
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Handling uncertainty in cost-effectiveness models.

Authors:  A H Briggs
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Valuing health-related quality of life. Issues and controversies.

Authors:  P Dolan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Interpretation of graphic data by patients in a general medicine clinic.

Authors:  D J Mazur; D H Hickam
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Studying patients' preferences in health care decision making. Health Services Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-09-15       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Decision analysis: applications and limitations. The Health Services Research Group.

Authors:  V Goel
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Chained time trade-off and standard gamble methods. Applications in oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Paul McNamee; Sharon Glendinning; Jonathan Shenfine; Nick Steen; S Michael Griffin; John Bond
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2004-02

9.  Neck pain patients' preference scores for their current health.

Authors:  Gabrielle van der Velde; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Ahmed M Bayoumi; Pierre Côté; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Eric L Hurwitz; Murray Krahn
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Subjectivity in decision making: common problems and limitations.

Authors:  M M Ravitch
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.