Literature DB >> 7180625

Measurement of smoking: surveys and some recommendations.

R H Shipley, T J Rosen, C Williams.   

Abstract

A survey of smoking cessation researchers found considerable disagreement in the measurement procedures used to determine treatment outcome. The survey investigated (1) the duration of the measurement interval used to determine abstinence and smoking rate; (2) procedures for classifying people who smoke after treatment but are abstinent at follow-up; and (3) procedures for classifying people who use marijuana or tobacco products other than cigarettes. The marked disagreement among researchers' survey responses was compounded by the failure of their published articles to explain how smoking had been measured and scored. The Discussion identifies long-term abstinence as the most critical problem; its measurement was least consistent procedurally across studies yet most important for comparing them. Recommendations are made for establishing measurement and reporting conventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7180625     DOI: 10.1016/0306-4603(82)90059-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addict Behav        ISSN: 0306-4603            Impact factor:   3.913


  3 in total

Review 1.  Do point prevalence and prolonged abstinence measures produce similar results in smoking cessation studies? A systematic review.

Authors:  John R Hughes; Matthew J Carpenter; Shelly Naud
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Supportive follow-up for cigarette smokers in a family practice: issues of method, analysis and state of the art.

Authors:  D M Wilson; J Singer; J A Best
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1987-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Methodologic issues in evaluating stop smoking programs.

Authors:  L T Midanik; M R Polen; E M Hunkeler; I S Tekawa; K Soghikian
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 9.308

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.