Literature DB >> 717617

A comparative study of physicians' and nurses' conceptions of the role of the nurse practitioner.

G L Burkett, M Parken-Harris, J C Kuhn, G H Escovitz.   

Abstract

Attempts to define the role of the nurse practitioner as a new health care provider raise questions about the traditional health care division of labor. In order to determine nurses' and physicians' conceptions of the NP's role, parallel surveys were conducted among registered nurses and primary care physicians in southeastern Pennsylvania (including Philadelphia). Respondents (679 nurses and 597 physicians) indicated their opinions on the issue of autonomy for NPs and on the issue of specific tasks appropriate to the NP's role. There were significant differences between nurses and physicians with respect to both of the issues under consideration, but there were also important differences within each of these groups. Nurses were more likely to assert that an NP might practice independently, and also had a higher conception of the NP's capabilities. Physicians who were interested in employing a nurse practitioner had opinions which were closest to those of nurses. These findings suggest that conflict between nurses and physicians might be minimal as long as the nurse practitioner movement remains relatively small, but that there may be latent conflict inherent in any large scale attempt to change the health care division of labor at the present time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 717617      PMCID: PMC1654016          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.68.11.1090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  16 in total

1.  Physician receptivity to nurse practitioners: a study of the correlates of the delegation of clinical responsibility.

Authors:  R S Lawrence; G H DeFriese; S M Putnam; C G Pickard; A B Cyr; S W Whiteside
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Nursing is coming of age...through the practitioner movement. Con:.

Authors:  M E Rogers
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 2.220

3.  Nursing is comming of age...through the practitioner movement. Pro:.

Authors:  I G Mauksch
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 2.220

4.  Nursing: to be or not to be?

Authors:  M E Rogers
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 3.250

5.  Nurse-physician interaction in a family medical care center.

Authors:  I G Mauksch; P R Young
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 3.250

6.  Nurse practitioner: reflections on the role.

Authors:  A C Moore
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 3.250

7.  Editorial: Is that name necessary?

Authors:  T M Schorr
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 2.220

8.  The use of nurse practitioners in a general practice.

Authors:  J H Merenstein; H Wolfe; K M Barker
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 9.  Doctor and nurse: changing roles and relations.

Authors:  B Bates
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1970-07-16       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Investigation of the perceived role functions and attitudes of the nurse practitioner role in a primary care clinic.

Authors:  B E Theiss
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 1.437

View more
  4 in total

1.  Rural health care consumers' perceptions of the nurse practitioner role.

Authors:  F J Kviz; T R Misener; N Vinson
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1983

2.  The nurse practitioner movement--where does it go from here?

Authors:  I G Mauksch
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  A study of the economic viability of low-cost, fee-for-service clinics staffed by nurse practitioners.

Authors:  F S Tennant; K Sorenson; C Simmons; C M Day
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1980 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  The nurse practitioner's role in complex patient management: hypertension.

Authors:  M J Reichgott; S Pearson; M N Hill
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 1.798

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.