Literature DB >> 7171524

High oestrogen excretion in pregnancy.

I R McFadyen, H G Worth, D J Wright, S S Notta.   

Abstract

Fifty-one women with singleton pregnancies whose urinary oestrogen excretion was above the 95th centile of the hospital's reference range on two or more occasions were reviewed. The women did not differ from the general population in race, parity, age, height or weight gain during pregnancy, but they were slightly heavier. Fetal and placental weights were greater than the corresponding values in the general population , as were the volumes of urine containing the oestrogen, but none of these differences was sufficient to account for oestrogen excretion above the 95th centile. Eleven patients had a glucose tolerance test, two of them had abnormal results and nine had normal results but heavy babies. Patterns of oestrogen excretion did not identify a high-risk population but the women with consistently high excretion gave birth to eight of the nine babies that weighed greater than or equal to 4 kg in this population. Twenty-two of the women had 23 subsequent pregnancies in which oestrogen excretion was measured: excretion was normal in 17, low in two and above the 95th centile in four.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7171524     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb04653.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0306-5456


  6 in total

1.  Perinatal characteristics in relation to incidence of and mortality from prostate cancer.

Authors:  A Ekbom; C C Hsieh; L Lipworth; A Wolk; J Pontén; H O Adami; D Trichopoulos
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-08-10

2.  Placental characteristics as a proxy measure of serum hormone and protein levels during pregnancy with a male fetus.

Authors:  Britton Trabert; Matthew P Longnecker; Barry I Graubard; Mark A Klebanoff; Frank Z Stanczyk; Katherine A McGlynn
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Birth weight and subsequent risk of cancer.

Authors:  Cassandra N Spracklen; Robert B Wallace; Shawnita Sealy-Jefferson; Jennifer G Robinson; Jo L Freudenheim; Melissa F Wellons; Audrey F Saftlas; Linda G Snetselaar; JoAnn E Manson; Lifang Hou; Lihong Qi; Rowan T Chlebowski; Kelli K Ryckman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 4.  Hormones and mammary carcinogenesis in mice, rats, and humans: a unifying hypothesis.

Authors:  S Nandi; R C Guzman; J Yang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Examining breast cancer growth and lifestyle risk factors: early life, childhood, and adolescence.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Ruder; Joanne F Dorgan; Sibylle Kranz; Penny M Kris-Etherton; Terryl J Hartman
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  Intrauterine environments and breast cancer risk: meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Sue Kyung Park; Daehee Kang; Katherine A McGlynn; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Yeonju Kim; Keun Young Yoo; Louise A Brinton
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-01-21       Impact factor: 6.466

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.