Literature DB >> 7168791

Optimal allocation for the comparison of proportions.

E Brittain, J J Schlesselman.   

Abstract

Optimal allocation strategies for the comparison of proportions, p1 and p2, in two groups are discussed. Allocations which (i) maximize the precision in the estimation of the difference p1-p2, (ii) maximize the precision in the estimation of the ratio p1/p2, (iii) maximize the power to detect a group difference, and (iv) minimize the total cost of a study are compared. The recommended allocation varies markedly with the desired objective. Furthermore, there is a wide range of allocation schemes which are effectively optimal with regard to each criterion considered. A study of congenital malformations occurring in pregnancies of diabetic women is used to illustrate how these considerations apply to the planning of a study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7168791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  10 in total

1.  Sample size for monitoring of toxic chemical sites.

Authors:  J R Alldredge
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  When and how does schizophrenia produce social deficits?

Authors:  H Häfner; B Nowotny; W Löffler; W an der Heiden; K Maurer
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 3.  Overcoming obstacles in the design of cancer anorexia/weight loss trials.

Authors:  Jennifer G Le-Rademacher; Jeffrey Crawford; William J Evans; Aminah Jatoi
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 6.312

4.  PTSD as a moderator of a parenting intervention for military families.

Authors:  Ashley A Chesmore; Timothy F Piehler; Abigail H Gewirtz
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2017-12-28

5.  Outcome--adaptive randomization: is it useful?

Authors:  Edward L Korn; Boris Freidlin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Maximin optimal designs for cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Sheng Wu; Weng Kee Wong; Catherine M Crespi
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 1.701

Review 7.  Basic design considerations for clinical trials in oncology.

Authors:  S Piantadosi; N Saijo; T Tamura
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1992-06

8.  Commentary: Arguing for Adaptive Clinical Trials in Sepsis.

Authors:  Miriam Kesselmeier; André Scherag
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 7.561

9.  Pelvic tenderness is not limited to the prostate in chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) type IIIA and IIIB: comparison of men with and without CP/CPPS.

Authors:  Richard E Berger; Marcia A Ciol; Ivan Rothman; Judith A Turner
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 2.264

10.  Burden of Antimicrobial Resistance: Compared to What?

Authors:  Marlieke E A de Kraker; Marc Lipsitch
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 6.222

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.