Literature DB >> 7163850

Electrolytes, sugar, calories, osmolarity and pH of beverages and coconut water.

B Chavalittamrong, P Pidatcha, U Thavisri.   

Abstract

Oral rehydration has been recommended in patients with diarrhoea to replace fluid loss from the gastrointestinal tract and reduce the need for intravenous therapy. Beverages (i.e. Cola, Sprite etc.) and coconut water may be used as sources of oral fluid when glucose-electrolyte solution is not available. To evaluate the usefulness and effectiveness of these soft drinks, the basic data such as electrolytes, sugar, calories, osmolarity and pH were determined. The electrolytes of the beverages were significantly lower (p less than 0.001) than the coconut water, especially potassium. The osmolarity of the beverages, which were 693 mOsm/l, was significantly higher (p less than 0.001) than the coconut water (288 mOsm/l); pH of the beverages (3.1) was more acidic (p less than 0.001) than the coconut water (5.4). While the sugar content of the beverages, which were 8.7 gm/dl, was significantly higher (p less than 0.001) than the coconut water (1.1 gm/dl). On comparison, all brands of beverages would give more calories than the coconut water however the coconut water would be absorbed more easily than any brand of soft drink beverage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7163850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health        ISSN: 0125-1562            Impact factor:   0.267


  3 in total

1.  Arterial hypertension due to fructose ingestion: model based on intermittent osmotic fluid trapping in the small bowel.

Authors:  Sven Kurbel
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 2.432

2.  Comparison of coconut water and a carbohydrate-electrolyte sport drink on measures of hydration and physical performance in exercise-trained men.

Authors:  Douglas S Kalman; Samantha Feldman; Diane R Krieger; Richard J Bloomer
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 5.150

3.  Effect of Health-Promoting Agents on Exclusion-Zone Size.

Authors:  Abha Sharma; Colby Adams; Benjamin D Cashdollar; Zheng Li; Nam V Nguyen; Himasri Sai; Jiachun Shi; Gautham Velchuru; Kevin Z Zhu; Gerald H Pollack
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 2.658

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.