| Literature DB >> 7158318 |
C E Margo, J D Trobe, J J Shuster.
Abstract
A critical review of published ophthalmic histocompatibility antigen association studies found numerous conflicting or ambiguous reports. Methodologic errors that could account for these discrepancies were categorized into 3 groups (1) arbitrary application of statistical methods to determine significance, (2) poor sampling design, and (3) variable disease definition. Multivariate analysis, not previously applied in this area provides a more powerful tool for assessing statistical significance. A computer program using this methodology for large studies is now available.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1982 PMID: 7158318 DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1982.tb00598.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) ISSN: 0001-639X