Literature DB >> 7155990

Abnormal levels of plasma hormones in men with prostate cancer: evidence toward a "two-disease" theory.

B Zumoff, J Levin, G W Strain, R S Rosenfeld, J O'Connor, S Z Freed, J Kream, W S Whitmore, D K Fukushima, L Hellman.   

Abstract

The 24-hr mean plasma concentrations of 13 hormones or hormone metabolites (cortisol, testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, dehydroisoandrosterone, dehydroisoandrosterone sulfate, androsterone, androsterone sulfate, estrone, thyroxine, triiodothyronine, LH, FSH, and prolactin) were measured in 16 rigorously screened patients (aged 55-80) with stage C or D prostate cancer and 36 normal men. Nine of the hormones showed no abnormalities in the patients but four (testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, cortisol, and estrone) showed abnormalities. Testosterone and dihydrotestosterone, which, respectively, decreased with age and showed no change with age in the normal men, rose sharply with age in the patients. The patients' curves crossed the normal curves at about age 65; patients 65 or above showed normal values while patients under age 65 showed significantly subnormal levels of both hormones: testosterone averaged 282 ng/dl in patients vs 434 ng/dl in controls (P less than 0.0001) and dihydrotestosterone averaged 70 ng/dl in patients vs 99 ng/dl in controls (P less than 0.01). Cortisol, which was age invariant in the normal men, fell sharply with age in the patients; patients under 65 had significantly elevated levels (10.1 vs 6.9 micrograms/dl; P less than 0.0001), while patients 65 or older had normal levels. Estrone levels were age invariant in both patients and controls, but the mean level in patients was markedly elevated (81 vs 47 pg/ml in controls; P less than 0.001). The cortisol/testosterone ratio almost completely separated prostate cancer patients under 65 from normal men, but did not discriminate patients 65 or older from normal. The findings indicate that prostate cancer patients under 65 differ markedly in their endogenous hormonal pattern from patients 65 or older. This leads us to propose a "two-disease" theory of prostate cancer, with possible differences in genetic factors and prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7155990     DOI: 10.1002/pros.2990030607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  6 in total

1.  Physical activity and the risk of prostate and testicular cancer: a cohort study of 53,000 Norwegian men.

Authors:  I Thune; E Lund
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Circulating testosterone, prostatic nuclear androgen receptor and time to progression in patients with metastatic disease of the prostate treated by orchiectomy.

Authors:  O G van Aubel; J Bolt-de Vries; M A Blankenstein; F H de Jong; F H Schröder
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1989

3.  Challenges with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists: flare and surge.

Authors:  Michael K Brawer
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

4.  Androgen supplementation and prostate cancer risk: strategies for pretherapy assessment and monitoring.

Authors:  Michael K Brawer
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

5.  Review of prostatic surgical procedures at a predominantly black hospital: a 22-year study.

Authors:  M Y Heshmat; J Kovi; M S Rao; S Mohla; D W Spurlin; G Jean-Baptiste
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  Serum pituitary and sex steroid hormone levels in the etiology of prostatic cancer--a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  S O Andersson; H O Adami; R Bergström; L Wide
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.