Literature DB >> 7153928

Intrinsic noise in locust photoreceptors.

S B Laughlin, P G Lillywhite.   

Abstract

1. In locust photoreceptors, the amplitude of the response to light pulses lasting less than 20 ms depends solely upon the number of absorbed photons, which can be estimated at low intensities by counting quantum bumps. Consequently, each receptor can be operated as a calibrated photon counter. 2. Three types of noise in receptor responses have been identified--extrinsic or photon noise and two types of intrinsic noise, dark noise (spontaneous activity) and transducer noise (noise in the transduction mechanism). The methods by which the noise sources are measured and identified involves measuring the responses to a train of flashes of constant intensity and converting these voltage values into a series of equivalent quantum catches. Because photon absorptions follow the Poisson distribution, the variance among equivalent catches due to photon noise equals the mean catch, and any excess variance represents intrinsic noise. 3. Dark noise is negligible: spontaneous signals (quantum bumps produced in darkness) occur less than ten times per hour at 25 degrees C, and the combined effects of membrane and electrode noise are unimportant at all but the highest intensities. 4. At low intensities transducer noise is responsible for more than 50% of all receptor noise (variance), and this rises to 90% when bright stimuli are presented to the dark-adapted eye. 5. Two simple models of transduction indicate that variations in the amplitudes and latencies of responses to single photons are a major source of transducer noise. 6. Transducer noise would be difficult to detect from an analysis of response noise alone, without knowledge of absolute photon catch, because in some important respects it mimics photon noise, e.g. it lowers the quantum efficiency without violating the square root relationship relating increment thresholds to mean intensity.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7153928      PMCID: PMC1197384          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  25 in total

Review 1.  Distributed relaxation processes in sensory adaptation.

Authors:  J Thorson; M Biederman-Thorson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-01-18       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Voltage noise in Limulus visual cells.

Authors:  F A Dodge; B W Knight; J Toyoda
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-04-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Responses to single photons in virual cells of limulus.

Authors:  A Borsellino; M G Fuortes
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1968-06       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Movement of palisade in locust retinula cells when illuminated.

Authors:  G A Horridge; P B Barnard
Journal:  Q J Microsc Sci       Date:  1965-06

5.  Complete model for the statistical composition of the end-plate potential.

Authors:  B Soucek
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  Induction of photoreceptor voltage noise in the dark in Drosophila mutant.

Authors:  B Minke; C Wu; W L Pak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-11-06       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The statistical nature of the acetycholine potential and its molecular components.

Authors:  B Katz; R Miledi
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Control of retinal sensitivity. I. Light and dark adaptation of vertebrate rods and cones.

Authors:  R A Normann; F S Werblin
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 4.086

9.  Quantal basis of photoreceptor spectral sensitivity of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  C F Wu; W L Pak
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  Effects of sodium, potassium, and calcium ions on slow and spike potentials in single photoreceptor cells.

Authors:  B Fulpius; F Baumann
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  17 in total

1.  Impact of neural noise on a sensory-motor pathway signaling impending collision.

Authors:  Peter W Jones; Fabrizio Gabbiani
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Vision in dim light: highlights and challenges.

Authors:  David C O'Carroll; Eric J Warrant
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  The remarkable visual capacities of nocturnal insects: vision at the limits with small eyes and tiny brains.

Authors:  Eric J Warrant
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Thresholds and noise limitations of colour vision in dim light.

Authors:  Almut Kelber; Carola Yovanovich; Peter Olsson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Electrical coupling of neuro-ommatidial photoreceptor cells in the blowfly.

Authors:  J H van Hateren
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  The quantal source of area supralinearity of flash responses in Limulus photoreceptors.

Authors:  N M Grzywacz; P Hillman; B W Knight
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.086

Review 7.  Phototransduction and the evolution of photoreceptors.

Authors:  Gordon L Fain; Roger Hardie; Simon B Laughlin
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Information and discriminability as measures of reliability of sensory coding.

Authors:  Jan Grewe; Matti Weckström; Martin Egelhaaf; Anne-Kathrin Warzecha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Dendritic Pooling of Noisy Threshold Processes Can Explain Many Properties of a Collision-Sensitive Visual Neuron.

Authors:  Matthias S Keil
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Bumblebees Perform Well-Controlled Landings in Dim Light.

Authors:  Therese Reber; Marie Dacke; Eric Warrant; Emily Baird
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.