Literature DB >> 7149760

Secular change in birthweight of Asian babies born in Birmingham.

C L Clarson, M J Barker, T Marshall, B A Wharton.   

Abstract

We have studied changes in the birthweight of Asian babies born alive at this hospital between 1968 and 1978. In 1978 Pakistani babies were 139 g heavier but Indian babies only 25 g heavier than 10 years earlier. Contributing to these changes were significantly fewer short mothers and primiparae among Pakistanis, and non-significant increases in gestational age and intrauterine growth (that is, weight centile after allowing for gestational age, parity, and maternal height). Among Indians there were significant increases in maternal height and gestational age, but parity was reduced and intrauterine growth did not increase. In both groups there were fewer teenage mothers, but whereas among Pakinstanis birth intervals of less than one year were less common, there was no such reduction among Indian mothers. The secular change suggests that genetic factors are unlikely to be the major reason why Pakistani babies born in Birmingham are lighter than European babies, and that environmental factors play an important role. Efforts to increase birthweight need to consider both the mothers' physical environment during pregnancy and prepregnancy factors influencing growth in childhood, age at first pregnancy, and birth interval. The study shows a need to describe an 'Asian' population with details of their sub-ethnic structure. The sub-ethnic and secular differences further suggest that a single 'Asian' standard for birthweight and intrauterine growth may be inappropriate; the use of international reference data with which all infants may be compared is preferable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7149760      PMCID: PMC1628028          DOI: 10.1136/adc.57.11.867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  10 in total

1.  Study of birth weight and its relation with gestational age and maternal factors.

Authors:  K C Praharaj; R K Satapathy
Journal:  J Indian Med Assoc       Date:  1975-08-16

2.  Effect of maternal factors on the clinical features, morbidity and mortality of the newborn.

Authors:  N Idnani; U Sharma; S Saxena
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  Immigrant children and the day-to-day work of a paediatrician.

Authors:  M W Arthurton
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1972-02       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  The assessment of fetal growth.

Authors:  A M Thomson; W Z Billewicz; F E Hytten
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw       Date:  1968-09

5.  Child growth standards.

Authors:  J C Waterlow
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-03-29       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Dietary protein energy supplementation of pregnant Asian mothers at Sorrento, Birmingham. II: Selective during third trimester only.

Authors:  O A Viegas; P H Scott; T J Cole; P Eaton; P G Needham; B A Wharton
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982 Aug 28-Sep 4

7.  Fetal growth in different racial groups.

Authors:  J Alvear; O G Brooke
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Relations between gestation period and certain maternal and foetal factors.

Authors:  R Gopalakrishnan
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 1.967

9.  Size at birth from 37 - 41 weeks gestation: ethnic standards for British infants of both sexes.

Authors:  O G Brooke; F Butters; C Wood; P Bailey; F Tukmachi
Journal:  J Hum Nutr       Date:  1981-12

10.  Measuring children: one reference for all.

Authors:  P L Graitcer; E M Gentry
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-08-08       Impact factor: 79.321

  10 in total
  12 in total

1.  Screening for intrauterine growth retardation using ratio of mid-arm circumference to occipitofrontal circumference.

Authors:  N J Meadows; J Till; A Leaf; E Hughes; B Jani; V Larcher
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-04-19

2.  Duration of human singleton pregnancies in Ibadan, Nigeria.

Authors:  A O Omigbodun; A Adewuyi
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Comparison of sonographic triplet fetal growth measurements between Japanese and American populations.

Authors:  Masashi Akiyama; Atsushi Kuno; Masazi Utsu; Toshiyuki Hata
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.314

4.  Consanguinity and fetal growth in Pakistani Moslems.

Authors:  M M Honeyman; L Bahl; T Marshall; B A Wharton
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Birth size in Indian ethnic subgroups born in Britain.

Authors:  P Chetcuti; S H Sinha; M I Levene
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Birthweight of Asian babies in Birmingham.

Authors:  D J DeSa
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Preschool weights and heights of Europeans and five subgroups of Asians in Britain.

Authors:  A R Gatrad; N Birch; M Hughes
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Disparities in infant mortality: what's genetics got to do with it?

Authors:  Richard David; James Collins
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Race, consanguinity and social features in Birmingham babies: a basis for prospective study.

Authors:  S Bundey; H Alam; A Kaur; S Mir; R J Lancashire
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  The implications of diagnosis of small for gestational age fetuses using European and South Asian growth charts: an outcome-based comparative study.

Authors:  Gianpaolo Maso; Mathota A M M Jayawardane; Salvatore Alberico; Monica Piccoli; Hemantha M Senanayake
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-01-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.