Literature DB >> 7148708

Value of the H-Q interval in patients with bundle branch block and the role of prophylactic permanent pacing.

M M Scheinman, R W Peters, M J Suavé, J Desai, J A Abbott, J Cogan, B Wohl, K Williams.   

Abstract

His bundle electrograms were obtained in 313 patients with chronic bundle branch block who were followed for a mean period of almost 3 years. The infranodal conduction time (H-Q interval) was less than 55 ms in 97 patients (Group I), 55 to 69 ms in 99 patients (Group II), and greater than or equal to 70 ms in 117 patients (Group III). There was a higher incidence of organic heart disease in patients in Group III, but the groups were otherwise comparable. On follow-up study, mortality and the incidence of sudden death were similar among the groups, but patients in Group III had a greater incidence of progression to high degree atrioventricular block (HDB) than did those in Groups I and II (14 of 117 [12%] versus 4 of 97 [4%] and 2 of 99 [2%], p less than 0.01, respectively). High degree block was found in 4 of 17 (24%) patients with an H-Q interval (H-Q) greater than or equal to 100 ms. Sixty-two patients underwent permanent prophylactic pacemaker insertion at the discretion of the referring physician and were compared with 231 patients who did not. Paced patients had a higher incidence of transient neurologic symptoms and prolonged H-Q, but the groups were otherwise comparable. On follow-up study, mortality and the incidence of sudden death were similar among the groups, but symptom relief was significantly more common among patients with pacemakers. In conclusion, in our population (1) H-Q greater than or equal to 70 ms was an independent risk factor for progression to HDB, (2) H-Q greater than or equal to 100 ms identified a subgroup at particularly high risk, and (3) prophylactic pacemakers relieved neurologic symptoms but did not prolong life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7148708     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(82)90469-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  22 in total

1.  Heart Block and Conduction Disturbances.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  1999-08

2.  [Guidelines for heart pacemaker therapy].

Authors:  B Lemke; B Nowak; D Pfeiffer
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-10

3.  [Commentary on the guidelines the diagnosis and the therapy of syncope--the European Society of Cardiology 2001 and the update 2004].

Authors:  K Seidl; A Schuchert; J Tebbenjohanns; W Hartung
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-09

4.  Score indices for predicting electrophysiologic outcomes in patients with unexplained syncope.

Authors:  Lin Y Chen; Arshad Jahangir; Wyatt W Decker; Peter A Smars; Wouter Wieling; David O Hodge; Bernard J Gersh; Stephen C Hammill; Win-Kuang Shen
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009).

Authors:  Angel Moya; Richard Sutton; Fabrizio Ammirati; Jean-Jacques Blanc; Michele Brignole; Johannes B Dahm; Jean-Claude Deharo; Jacek Gajek; Knut Gjesdal; Andrew Krahn; Martial Massin; Mauro Pepi; Thomas Pezawas; Ricardo Ruiz Granell; Francois Sarasin; Andrea Ungar; J Gert van Dijk; Edmond P Walma; Wouter Wieling
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Unusual origin of type 1 atrioventricular block with comments on Wenckebach's contribution.

Authors:  Anumeha Tandon; Leo Simpson; Manish D Assar
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2011-01

Review 7.  Re-evaluating the electro-vectorcardiographic criteria for left bundle branch block.

Authors:  Andrés Ricardo Pérez-Riera; Raimundo Barbosa-Barros; Rodrigo Daminello-Raimundo; Luiz Carlos de Abreu; Marcos Célio de Almeida; Jani Rankinen; Fabio Baeub Soler; Kjell Nikus
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 1.468

8.  Electrophysiological Testing for the Investigation of Bradycardias.

Authors:  Demosthenes G Katritsis; Mark E Josephson
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2017-04

9.  Association of cardiac implantable electronic devices with survival in bifascicular block and prolonged PR interval on electrocardiogram.

Authors:  Naeem Moulki; Jessica V Kealhofer; David G Benditt; Amy Gravely; Kairav Vakil; Santiago Garcia; Selcuk Adabag
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  Disopyramide induced second and third degree atrioventricular block in patients with bifascicular block. An acute stress test to predict atrioventricular block progression.

Authors:  L Bergfeldt; M Rosenqvist; H Vallin; O Edhag
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1985-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.