Literature DB >> 7148693

Prospective evaluation of radionuclide angiocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

E H Austin, F R Cobb, R E Coleman, R H Jones.   

Abstract

This investigation assesses prospectively the accuracy of rest and exercise radionuclide angiocardiography (RNA) in detecting coronary artery disease (CAD). By retrospective analysis of 496 patients, optimal RNA criteria were determined for the presence or absence of CAD. Multivariate analysis of patients with normal coronary arteries on catheterization provided a formula to predict normal exercise ejection fraction (EF) in a given patient. The presence of CAD was indicated by 1 or more of the following RNA measurements: (1) rest EF less than 0.50, (2) exercise EF at least 0.06 less than the predicted value, (3) exercise increase in end-systolic volume greater than 20 ml, (4) exercise-induced wall motion abnormality. The absence of CAD was indicated by the absence of all 4 criteria. After applying these criteria to 221 consecutive patients, the RNA determinations were compared with the catheterization, determinations. Significant CAD was present in 71% of the patients studied. The sensitivity of the test was 0.87 and the specificity 0.54. Thus, because of its high sensitivity, RNA is of value in screening patients under consideration for cardiac catheterization. No patient with significant left main coronary narrowing and only 4 of 65 patients with 3-vessel disease were misdiagnosed. The poor specificity of the test, however, limits its overall accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7148693     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(82)90451-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive tests for diagnosing the presence and extent of coronary artery disease: exercise electrocardiography, thallium scintigraphy, and radionuclide ventriculography.

Authors:  L Goldman; T H Lee
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1986 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Quantitative phase analysis in the assessment of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  S R Underwood; S Walton; P J Laming; P J Ell; R W Emanuel; R H Swanton
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1989-01

3.  Diagnostic testing revisited: pathways through uncertainty.

Authors:  M T Schechter; S B Sheps
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1985-04-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Does myocardial perfusion imaging provide incremental prognostic information to left ventricular ejection fraction?

Authors:  Daniel W Mudrick; Eric Velazquez; Salvador Borges-Neto
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.931

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.