Literature DB >> 7147718

Recovery and nonmonotone masking effects.

D G Purcell, A L Stewart, E P Hochberg.   

Abstract

Recovery was produced by a homogeneous flash of light (M2). With M2 absent, correct letter report was a U-shaped curve when plotted against the interval separating the onset of a letter target and the onset of a patterned masking stimulus (M1). With the homogeneous flash of light ed to the stimulus sequence (target + M1 + M2), recovery occurred for all the shortest delays between the onsets of target and M1. Recovery peaked at a constant separation between the onsets of the target and M2, regardless, of the separation between the onsets of the target and M1. Current explanations of recovery cannot account for this result.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7147718     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(82)90071-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  2 in total

1.  Target recovery in metacontrast: the effect of contrast.

Authors:  Haluk Oğmen; Bruno G Breitmeyer; Steven Todd; Lynn Mardon
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Switching or sharing in dual-task line-length discrimination?

Authors:  J Miller; A M Bonnel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.