Literature DB >> 7146306

Evaluation of the use of rural health clinics: attitudes and behaviors of primary care physicians in service areas of nurse practitioner clinics.

T R Sharpe, B F Banahan.   

Abstract

In response to concerns of the directors of Rural Health Initiative projects in Mississippi, a study was conducted to examine factors related to use of rural health clinics. This report focuses on attitudes and behaviors of primary care physicians in the service areas of four clinics staffed by nurse practitioners. Data for this evaluation were obtained via mail questionnaires sent to 41 primary care physicians in the service areas of the clinics. Usable responses were received from 25 (61.0 percent) of the physicians. The data indicate that a majority of these physicians approve of the nurse practitioner concept. Although there is evidence to support a positive correlation between previous experience and knowledge concerning nurse practitioners and physician acceptance of the nurse practitioner concept, only about half of the physicians reported that anyone had ever contacted them to talk about the clinic. Only about a quarter of the physicians had ever visited the rural health clinic, but 60 percent indicated that they would like to do so. These findings indicate a need to develop closer working relationships with all primary care physicians in the service area of a rural health clinic. The data indicate that when such a closer relationship existed, physicians were satisfied with the outcome of interactions. Twelve (48 percent) physicians stated that they had patient(s) referred to them by the clinic. Among these physicians 77.8 percent were satisfied with the information that they had received on the patient's condition. Fewer physicians (8 or 32.0 percent) reported that they had received a call from the nurse practitioner clinic to consult about one of the physician's patients. The physicians were satisfied with the outcome of the consultation in each instance that was reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7146306      PMCID: PMC1424387     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  7 in total

1.  Public perceptions of the physicians' assistant--a survey of the attitudes and opinions of rural Iowa and Minnesota residents.

Authors:  T J Litman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The use of nurse practitioners in a general practice.

Authors:  J H Merenstein; H Wolfe; K M Barker
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Comparison of the physical assessment of children by pediatric nurse practitioners and pediatricians.

Authors:  B Duncan; A N Smith; H K Silver
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Acceptance of pediatric nurse practitioners; parents' opinion of combined care by a pediatrician and a pediatric nurse practitioner in a private practice.

Authors:  L R Day; R Egli; H K Silver
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1970-03

5.  Attitudes of Mississippi physicians toward nurse practitioners.

Authors:  B F Banahan; T R Sharpe
Journal:  J Miss State Med Assoc       Date:  1979-09

6.  Evaluation of the use of rural health clinics: knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of consumers.

Authors:  B F Banahan; T R Sharpe
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1982 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Allied health manpower strategies: estimates of the potential gains from efficient task delegation.

Authors:  F L Golladay; M Miller; K R Smith
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1973 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.983

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Health care provider and family acceptance of a rural community-based nursing service for chronically ill children.

Authors:  B A Cook; J P Krischer; R Kraft
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1986

Review 2.  The generalist health care workforce: issues and goals.

Authors:  S A Wartman; M Wilson; N Kahn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.128

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.