Literature DB >> 7145072

Internal decompression for multiple levels of lumbar spinal stenosis: a technical note.

P M Lin.   

Abstract

In cases of lumbar spinal stenosis, use of the wide decompressive procedure for neural compression without regard for the integrity of facets tends to lead to instability and the chronic pain syndrome. Experience with the posterior lumbar interbody fusion technique indicates that, in cases of multiple levels of spinal canal stenosis, the decompression can be made adequately by inferior and superior marginal laminotomy, mesial facetectomy with an osteotome, and foraminotomy with an angle bone punch and a supersonic curette. Internal thinning of the thickened lamina can be achieved by the shaving action of the supersonic curette done from within the spinal canal. This technique achieves the necessary internal decompression of the multiple levels of spinal stenosis without interruption of the integrity of the motion segment. The spinous processes and the supraspinous ligaments and the lateral half of the facet, with its firm fibrous capsules, are scrupulously preserved. The disc is not removed unless it is overtly extruded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7145072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  14 in total

Review 1.  The conservative surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly.

Authors:  Robert Gunzburg; Marek Szpalski
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Failed lumbar spinal surgery.

Authors:  S Dhar; R W Porter
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Midterm outcome after unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-year prospective study.

Authors:  Halit Cavuşoğlu; Ramazan Alper Kaya; Osman Nuri Türkmenoglu; Cengiz Tuncer; Ibrahim Colak; Yunus Aydin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Comparison of surgical procedures for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1975 to 1995.

Authors:  O Niggemeyer; J M Strauss; K P Schulitz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Lumbar disc herniation in patients with developmental spinal stenosis.

Authors:  L Y Dai; B Ni; L S Jia; H K Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Precise and limited decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  W Caspar; L Papavero; M K Sayler; H L Harkey
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  A predictive model for outcome after conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  K F Spratt; T S Keller; M Szpalski; K Vandeputte; R Gunzburg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  S F Ciricillo; P R Weinstein
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1993-02

9.  A comparison of the degree of lateral recess and foraminal enlargement with facet preservation in the treatment of lumbar stenosis with standard surgical tools versus a novel powered filing instrument: a cadaver study.

Authors:  Murat Cosar; Larry T Khoo; Christopher A Yeung; Anthony T Yeung
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2007-11-01

10.  Comparison of Modified Marmot Surgery and Lumbar Spinous Process Splitting Laminectomy in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Two-Year Outcomes.

Authors:  Keisuke Masuda; Hideki Shigematsu; Masato Tanaka; Sachiko Kawasaki; Yuma Suga; Yusuke Yamamoto; Eiichiro Iwata; Akinori Okuda; Yasuhito Tanaka
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2020-10-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.