Literature DB >> 7143125

Limits of spatial-frequency discrimination as evidence of neural interpolation.

J Hirsch, R Hylton.   

Abstract

We have studied the ability of observers to discriminate between suprathreshold vertical sinusoidal spatial-frequency gratings on the basis of spatial frequency. The results show that spatial-frequency discrimination is not a smooth function of spatial frequency but instead appears regularly segmented. Similar results were also obtained in an experiment in which observers discriminated between pairs of narrow vertical lines on the basis of their separation. Angular resolutions achieved for both discrimination tasks were less than the spacing between photo-receptors, requiring some type of neural interpolation. The similarity between the two sets of data indicates that discrimination between spatial-frequency gratings is probably based on the separation between two features exactly one cycle apart. We suggest that the segmentation reflects the existence of neural-image representations with discrete levels of spatial accuracy.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7143125     DOI: 10.1364/josa.72.001367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am        ISSN: 0030-3941


  9 in total

1.  Multiple groups of orientation-selective visual mechanisms underlying rapid orientated-line detection.

Authors:  D H Foster; S Westland
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Perceptual spatial frequency--orientation surface: psychophysics and line element theory.

Authors:  B Treutwein; I Rentschler; T Caelli
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Spatial and temporal properties of human rod vision in the achromat.

Authors:  R F Hess; K Nordby
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  A self-similar stack model for human and machine vision.

Authors:  G J Burton; N D Haig; I R Moorhead
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 5.  Nonlinear processes in visual pattern discrimination.

Authors:  H R Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Contributions of monocular and binocular cues to distance discrimination in natural scenes.

Authors:  Brian C McCann; Mary M Hayhoe; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Spatial Frequency Discrimination: Effects of Age, Reward, and Practice.

Authors:  Carlijn van den Boomen; Judith Carolien Peters
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Blur perception throughout the visual field in myopia and emmetropia.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; Lenna Walker; Peter J Bex; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Binocular rivalry produced by temporal frequency differences.

Authors:  David Alais; Amanda Parker
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.