Literature DB >> 7140800

Individualized aminophylline therapy in patients with obstructive airway disease: oral dosage prediction from an intravenous test dose.

Y Horai, T Ishizaki, T Sasaki, M Watanabe, J Kabe.   

Abstract

Theophylline disposition after an intravenous test dose of aminophylline was determined in 83 subjects: 7 patients with and 58 without congestive heart failure (CHF), and 18 healthy controls. Based on the pharmacokinetics of theophylline in the individual, the oral dosage of aminophylline was scheduled to attain steady-state trough theophylline concentrations (Cpred) near the therapeutic margin. Significant differences in theophylline clearance with a relatively constant volume of distribution were observed between various groups divided by age, smoking habit and CHF; the significantly different (p less than 0.001) mean clearance values were: 0.042 +/- 0.016 l/h/kg (mean +/- SD) in patients without CHF (n = 58) as opposed to 0.016 +/- 0.001 l/h/kg in patients with CHF (n = 7), 0.038 +/- 0.013 l/h/kg in non-smokers (n = 59) versus 0.054 +/- 0.015 l/h/kg in smoking subjects (n = 17), and 0.030 +/- 0.010 l/h/kg in elderly (greater than 60 years) non-smoking patients (n = 7) versus 0.057 +/- 0.017 l/h/kg in smoking patients (n = 5) aged 40 to 59 years. No gender-related difference was detected in theophylline disposition. For all subjects together (n = 83), there was no significant correlation between age and clearance (r = -0.111, p greater than 0.1). The multivariate analysis indicated that the overall variability in theophylline clearance was affected first by the smoking habit (t = 4.960; p less than 0.001) and second by CHF (t = -3.052; p less than 0.001), but not by age (t = 1.140) or by sex (t = 0.069). 78% of the patients who did not have CHF required a daily dose of aminophylline of 600 to 900 mg, whereas a dose of 300 to 450 mg was the rule in patients with CHF. The measured steady-state minimum concentration (Cmeas) ranged from 5.4 to 14.6 micrograms/ml (9.0 +/- 2.2 micrograms/ml: mean +/- SD) which was in good agreement with the Cpred (5.6 to 13.6, 9.0 +/- 1.6 micrograms/ml) in all patients (n = 60) who received the oral dose of aminophylline calculated from the test dose. The overall prediction error was -0.08 +/- 1.83 micrograms/ml (-1.42 +/- 19.90%); only 3 of 60 measurements were found to be outside +/- 2 SD. It is concluded that using a test dose to individualize aminophylline therapy is likely to remain the most reliable means to assure the maximum therapeutic benefit in patients with airway obstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7140800     DOI: 10.1007/bf00545964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  40 in total

1.  Dose-dependent kinetics of theophylline disposition in asthmatic children.

Authors:  M Weinberger; E Ginchansky
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  The influence of cigarette smoking and sex on theophylline disposition.

Authors:  J R Powell; J F Thiercelin; S Vozeh; L Sansom; S Riegelman
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1977-07

3.  The effect of assay methods on plasma levels and pharmacokinetics of theophylline: HPLC and EIA.

Authors:  T Ishizaki; M Watanabe; N Morishita
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Rational intravenous doses of theophylline.

Authors:  P A Mitenko; R I Ogilvie
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1973-09-20       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Pharmacokinetics of theophylline. Application to adjustment of the clinical dose of aminophylline.

Authors:  J W Jenne; M S Wyze; F S Rood; F M MacDonald
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1972 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Pharmacokinetics of theophylline in ten elderly patients.

Authors:  F Nielsen-Kudsk; I Magnussen; P Jakobsen
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh)       Date:  1978-03

7.  Influence of gender on theophylline dosage requirements in children with chronic asthma.

Authors:  L Hendeles; L Vaughan; M Weinberger; G Smith
Journal:  Drug Intell Clin Pharm       Date:  1981-05

8.  Kinetics of theophylline; variability and effect of arterial pH in chronic obstructive lung disease.

Authors:  R K Resar; P D Walson; W L Fritz; D F Perry; R A Barbee
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Absolute bioavailability of oral theophylline.

Authors:  L Hendeles; M Weinberger; L Bighley
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1977-05

10.  Prediction of steady-state imipramine and desmethylimipramine plasma concentrations from single-dose data.

Authors:  D J Brunswick; J D Amsterdam; J Mendels; S L Stern
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 6.875

View more
  3 in total

1.  Safety of fleroxacin coadministered with theophylline to young and elderly volunteers.

Authors:  M Parent; M St-Laurent; M LeBel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Effect of theophylline on respiratory neuromuscular drive.

Authors:  S Okubo; K Konno; T Ishizaki; M Kubo; T Suganuma; T Takizawa
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of theophylline following plain uncoated and sustained-release dosage forms in relation to smoking habit. II. Multiple dose study.

Authors:  T Ishizaki; Y Horai; T Sasaki; K Chiba; A Ohnishi; T Suganuma; G Tsujimoto; H Echizen; T Okaniwa
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.953

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.