Literature DB >> 7140136

Comparison of intravenous and oral verapamil dosing.

M J Reiter, D G Shand, E L Pritchett.   

Abstract

To compare the effects of intravenous and oral verapamil we examined the prolongation of the PR interval in 11 patients after (1) a single 10 mg IV bolus given over 2 min, (2) a single oral dose of 120 mg, and (3) a sustained concentration-maintaining infusion. Maximal PR interval prolongation was delayed relative to peak plasma verapamil concentration in all patients after the bolus and in seven of 11 patients after oral dosing. In all 11 patients oral verapamil was less potent than a single intravenous bolus of verapamil; the plasma verapamil concentration corresponding to a 10% prolongation of the PR was 39.5 +/- 21.7 ng/ml after the bolus and 146.3 +/- 75.1 ng/ml after the oral dose (P = 0.001). However, there was no such difference between oral verapamil and an infusion in six patients. The plasma verapamil concentration corresponding to a 10% PR prolongation was 35.7 +/- 24 ng/ml after the bolus, 132.5 +/- 80.8 ng/ml after the oral dose, and 85.2 +/- 29.9 ng/ml after the infusion. Maximum PR prolongation (drug efficacy) was comparable for the three methods of administration. There was no evidence of tachyphalaxis during prolonged infusions. We conclude that both oral doses and infusions of verapamil are less potent then bolus doses, but that drug efficacy at the concentrations reached is equivalent for the three. Plasma verapamil concentrations determined after bolus doses appear to underestimate effective plasma concentration when the drug is given by the oral or infusion methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7140136     DOI: 10.1038/clpt.1982.227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  18 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of verapamil following sublingual and oral administration to healthy volunteers.

Authors:  D N John; S Fort; M J Lewis; D K Luscombe
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Evaluation of potential pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions between verapamil and propranolol in normal subjects.

Authors:  D L Murdoch; G D Thomson; G G Thompson; G D Murray; M J Brodie; G T McInnes
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of antiarrhythmic drugs. Rationale and current status.

Authors:  R Latini; A P Maggioni; A Cavalli
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  New mathematical implementation of generalized pharmacodynamic models: method and clinical evaluation.

Authors:  G Stagni; A M Shepherd; Y Liu; W R Gillespie
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1997-06

5.  Understanding the hysteresis loop conundrum in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships.

Authors:  Christopher Louizos; Jaime A Yáñez; M Laird Forrest; Neal M Davies
Journal:  J Pharm Pharm Sci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.327

Review 6.  Verapamil. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension.

Authors:  D McTavish; E M Sorkin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations in drug therapy of cardiac emergencies.

Authors:  P Pentel; N Benowitz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1984 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Plasma levels and myocardial content of verapamil, norverapamil and two N-dealkyl-metabolites in man.

Authors:  R Padrini; E Barbieri; D Piovan; M Toffoli; A Motta; G P Trevi; M Ferrari
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Pharmacokinetics of (+)-, (-)- and (+/-)-verapamil after intravenous administration.

Authors:  M Eichelbaum; G Mikus; B Vogelgesang
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 10.  First-pass elimination. Basic concepts and clinical consequences.

Authors:  S M Pond; T N Tozer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1984 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.