Literature DB >> 7139401

Alfathesin and etomidate for minor outpatient anaesthesia.

D H Morison, G L Dunn, A de Graft-Johnson.   

Abstract

Etomidate was compared with alfathesin for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia in a double-blind fashion in 48 fit patients undergoing minor gynaecological operations as outpatients. The patients were randomized to receive either etomidate 0.3 mg . kg-1 or alfathesin 75 microliters . kg-1 as intravenous induction agents. All patients received fentanyl 1 microgram . kg-1 and breathed 70 per cent nitrous oxide in oxygen. Cardiovascular changes were minimal in both groups and there was less depression of minute volume with etomidate. The incidence of side effects including pain upon injection, involuntary movements, and postoperative nausea and vomiting was higher following etomidate. Recovery was equally rapid in both groups. No adverse reactions were seen. Alfathesin would appear to be preferable to etomidate as an induction and maintenance agent in unpremedicated fit outpatients undergoing minor gynaecological operations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7139401     DOI: 10.1007/bf03007751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J        ISSN: 0008-2856


  13 in total

1.  Nursing process in the recovery room.

Authors:  M R Fay
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 0.676

2.  Respiratory effects of etomidate.

Authors:  M Morgan; J Lumley; J G Whitwam
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Comparison of a new formulation of etomidate with thiopental--side effects and awakening times.

Authors:  R J Fragen; N Caldwell
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  CT1341: some effects in man. Cardiorespiratory, electroencephalographic and biochemical measurements.

Authors:  T M Savege; E I Foley; R J Coultas; B Walton; L Strunin; B R Simpson; D F Scott
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  Evaluation of three preparations of etomidate.

Authors:  M Zacharias; R S Clarke; J W Dundee; S B Johnston
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Etomidate vs. thiopental with and without fentanyl--a comparative study of awakening in man.

Authors:  R W Horrigan; J R Moyers; B H Johnson; E I Eger; A Margolis; S Goldsmith
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Adverse responses to i.v. anaesthetics.

Authors:  D Beamish; D T Brown
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Induction of anaesthesia with etomidate: haemodynamic study of 36 patients.

Authors:  A Criado; J Maseda; E Navarro; A Escarpa; F Avello
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  The influence of fentanyl on an alfathesin infusion technique.

Authors:  G L Dunn; P J Houlton; D H Morison; R Rajagopalan
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1978-07

10.  A comparative assessment of alfathesin for use in outpatient anaesthesia.

Authors:  G L Dunn; P J Houlton; D H Morison; R Rajagopalan
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1978-03
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  New iv induction anaesthetics.

Authors:  D H Morison
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.063

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.