Literature DB >> 7135456

Control of lidocaine therapy: new perspectives.

P A Routledge, W W Stargel, A Barchowsky, G S Wagner, D G Shand.   

Abstract

Although lidocaine has been available for clinical use for 30 years, it still retains an important place amongst antiarrhythmic drugs. It is still widely regarded as the first line of therapy in ventricular arrhythmias occurring after myocardial infarction or cardiac surgery. Recently, however, its use has been advocated in the prophylaxis of primary ventricular fibrillation occurring after myocardial infarction. This recommendation is based primarily on the well-designed and controlled study of Lie and co-workers (1). The results of this study have been reviewed and compared with the results of 11 other studies showing no significant effect of lidocaine in this situation (2). One other study did show that lidocaine gave protection against primary ventricular fibrillation (3). The authors concluded, however, that all the other studies had major defects in trial design, and were prepared to accept the conclusion that lidocaine was effective in preventing primary ventricular fibrillation after myocardial infraction. Similar conclusions were made by De Silva and co-workers (4). As a result, the drug is given in several centres in the U.S.A. to patients admitted with suspected acute myocardial infarction, particularly those aged less than 70 years who are seen within 6 h of the onset of chest pain (5,6).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7135456     DOI: 10.1097/00007691-198208000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Drug Monit        ISSN: 0163-4356            Impact factor:   3.681


  10 in total

Review 1.  The Smith Kline & French lecture 1987. Clinical pharmacology and the art of bespoke prescribing.

Authors:  P A Routledge
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  The plasma protein binding of basic drugs.

Authors:  P A Routledge
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  A free lignocaine index as a guide to unbound drug concentration.

Authors:  P A Routledge; J D Lazar; A Barchowsky; W W Stargel; G S Wagner; D G Shand
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Factors affecting free (unbound) lignocaine concentration in suspected acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  P A Routledge; W W Stargel; A Barchowsky; G S Wagner; D G Shand
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Rapid prediction of individual dosage requirements for lignocaine.

Authors:  S Vozeh; M Berger; M Wenk; R Ritz; F Follath
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1984 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  alpha 1-Acid glycoprotein and plasma lidocaine binding.

Authors:  D G Shand
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Interpretation of drug levels in acute and chronic disease states.

Authors:  E Perucca; R Grimaldi; A Crema
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1985 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  The pharmacokinetics of lignocaine and beta-adrenoceptor antagonists in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  S Nattel; G Gagne; M Pineau
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 9.  Clinical pharmacokinetic considerations in the elderly. An update.

Authors:  S Dawling; P Crome
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Protein binding and disposition of lignocaine in the elderly.

Authors:  B Cusack; K O'Malley; J Lavan; J Noel; J G Kelly
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.953

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.