Literature DB >> 7129741

A comparison of two models for scaling health indicators.

P Kind.   

Abstract

The measurement properties of a health status indicator are closely related to the scaling model on which it is based. The Thurstone and Bradley-Terry models are applied to paired comparisons data which had been used to scale the sleep category of the Nottingham Health Profile. The data in their original form are shown to be inadequately represented by either model. Weaknesses in the data are identified and the two scaling models are applied to the amended data. The results of applying two sets of scale values are compared.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7129741     DOI: 10.1093/ije/11.3.271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of health state utility values derived using time trade-off, rank and discrete choice data anchored on the full health-dead scale.

Authors:  John Brazier; Donna Rowen; Yaling Yang; Aki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-09-30

2.  The Spanish version of the Nottingham Health Profile: a review of adaptation and instrument characteristics.

Authors:  J Alonso; L Prieto; J M Antó
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Exploring health preferences in sociodemographic and health related groups through the paired comparison of the items of the Nottingham health profile.

Authors:  L Prieto; J Alonso
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Keep it simple: ranking health states yields values similar to cardinal measurement approaches.

Authors:  Benjamin M Craig; Jan J V Busschbach; Joshua A Salomon
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Head-to-head comparison of health-state values derived by a probabilistic choice model and scores on a visual analogue scale.

Authors:  Paul F M Krabbe; Elly A Stolk; Nancy J Devlin; Feng Xie; Elise H Quik; A Simon Pickard
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2016-11-02

Review 6.  Using surveys to calculate disability-adjusted life-year.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wiedermann; Ulrich Frick
Journal:  Alcohol Res       Date:  2013

7.  A generalized measurement model to quantify health: the multi-attribute preference response model.

Authors:  Paul F M Krabbe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Multinational evidence of the applicability and robustness of discrete choice modeling for deriving EQ-5D-5L health-state values.

Authors:  Paul F M Krabbe; Nancy J Devlin; Elly A Stolk; Koonal K Shah; Mark Oppe; Ben van Hout; Elise H Quik; A Simon Pickard; Feng Xie
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.983

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.