Literature DB >> 7129431

Comparison of two measuring methods for the evaluation of C-heterochromatin in human chromosomes.

C Staessen, M Kirsch-Volders, C Susanne.   

Abstract

In this study two different methods for evaluating the size of the C heterochromatin blocks of human chromosomes 1, 9, 16, and Y were compared. The first method measured the lengths of both the euchromatin and the C heterochromatin parts of the p and q arms of chromosomes 1, 9, 16, and Y. The second method analyzed the same chromosome segments, but by measuring the areas. In the comparison, the relative C heterochromatin value (length or surface) of each chromosome, the mean for each individual, the standard deviation, and the coefficient of variation were taken into account. It is proposed that the best estimation for the size of a C heterochromatin segment is the ratio of its length to the total length of the chromosome; accurate estimation requires at least 20 metaphases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7129431     DOI: 10.1007/bf00291337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  7 in total

1.  Chromosome preparations of leukocytes cultured from human peripheral blood.

Authors:  P S MOORHEAD; P C NOWELL; W J MELLMAN; D M BATTIPS; D A HUNGERFORD
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1960-09       Impact factor: 3.905

2.  Chromosome polymorphism in a human newborn population. II. Potentials of polymorphic chromosome variants for characterizing the idiogram of an individual.

Authors:  H Müller; H P Klinger; M Glasser
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1975

3.  Human Q and C chromosomal variations: distribution and incidence.

Authors:  W H McKenzie; H A Lubs
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1975

4.  Polymorphism of human C-band heterochromatin. I. Frequency of variants.

Authors:  A P Craig-Holmes; F B Moore; M W Shaw
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin.

Authors:  A T Sumner
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 3.905

6.  The quantitative analysis of polymorphism on human chromosomes 1, 9, 16, and Y. I. Description of individual karyotypes.

Authors:  O A Podugolnikova; I V Parfenova; H M Sushanlo; A A Prokofieva-Belgovskaja
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1979-07-18       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  C- and Q-band polymorphisms in the chromosomes of three human populations.

Authors:  K E Buckton; M L O'Riordan; P A Jacobs; J A Robinson; R Hill; H J Evans
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 1.670

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  C heterochromatin variation in couples with recurrent early abortions.

Authors:  A Maes; C Staessen; L Hens; E Vamos; M Kirsch-Volders; M C Lauwers; E Defrise-Gussenhoven; C Susanne
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 6.318

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.