Literature DB >> 7128670

Cumulative dose-response study comparing terbutaline pressurized aerosol administered via a pearshaped spacer and terbutaline in a nebulized solution.

E B Madsen, A Bundgaard, K G Hidinger.   

Abstract

The bronchodilator effects of cumulative doses of terbutaline 0.125 mg, 0.125 mg and 0.250 mg administered as a pressurized aerosol via a pear shaped spacer were compared with those of terbutaline 1.25 mg, 1.25 mg and 2.50 mg administered as a nebulized solution via a PARI-inhaler Boy. FEV1.0 and flow-volume curves in 13 patients were measured. Initial placebo treatment of both groups resulted in a significant increase in FEV1.0, especially when it was given in nebulized form. The increase after active drug was significant after 15 min, with only minor changes during the rest of the trial. The log-dose/increase in FEV1.0 showed that equipotent doses of pressurized and nebulized terbutaline were in the ratio 1 to 4. Administration by nebulization offered no clear advantage over use of a pressurized aerosol with a pearshaped spacer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7128670     DOI: 10.1007/bf01061373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  6 in total

1.  Aerosolized terbutaline in asthmatics. Comparison of dosage strength, schedule, and method of administration.

Authors:  R W Weber; W E Petty; H S Nelson
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 10.793

2.  Effects of terbutaline aerosol in reversible airway obstruction.

Authors:  M A Sackner; G Silva
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  A comparative study of the aerosolized bronchodilators, isoproterenol, metaproterenol and terbutaline in asthma.

Authors:  M J Roth; A F Wilson; H S Novey
Journal:  Ann Allergy       Date:  1977-01

4.  Evaluation of a new beta2 adrenergic receptor stimulant, terbutaline, in bronchospasm. III. Aerosol administration.

Authors:  P Glass; M J Dulfano
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  1975-09

5.  Bronchodilating effect of terbutaline aerosol.

Authors:  E H Chester; W E Doggett; H D Montenegro; H J Schwartz; P K Jones
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  The bronchodilator effects of aerosolized terbutaline. A controlled, double-blind study.

Authors:  B F Bachus; G L Snider
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1977-11-21       Impact factor: 56.272

  6 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  Inhaler devices for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease (COPD).

Authors:  J Wright; D Brocklebank; F Ram
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-12

2.  Inhalation devices.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Nebulisers for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  B R O'Driscoll
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  Nebuhaler versus nebuliser in children with acute asthma.

Authors:  M Freelander; P P Van Asperen
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-06-23

5.  Inhaled bronchodilator treatment via the nebuhaler in young asthmatic patients.

Authors:  J B Pool; A Greenough; J G Gleeson; J F Price
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Acute asthma: emergency department management and prospective evaluation of outcome.

Authors:  J M Fitzgerald; F E Hargreave
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1990-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Holding chambers (spacers) versus nebulisers for beta-agonist treatment of acute asthma.

Authors:  Christopher J Cates; Emma J Welsh; Brian H Rowe
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-09-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.