Literature DB >> 7124777

Therapeutic and economic value of a normal coronary angiogram.

D P Faxon, C H McCabe, D E Kreigel, T J Ryan.   

Abstract

A significant number of patients with severe angina or intractable atypical chest pain referred for coronary arteriography are found to have normal coronary vessels. To determine what therapeutic or economic benefit may be derived from these studies, we analyzed the data of 72 consecutive patients with normal vessels referred for cardiac catheterization because of severe chest pain. The clinical status and hospitalizations were analyzed for the 2 year period before and the 2 year period after angiography. There were no deaths or myocardial infarctions. Although 47 were thought to have angina and 25 atypical pain before catheterization, the chest pain was reclassified with only 15 continuing to have anginal pain, 40 atypical pain, and 17 no pain. Functional improvement by at least one New York Heart Association class occurred in 74 percent of patients with 36 (50 percent) having no functional limitation. The use of cardiac medications was also significantly reduced. Despite functional improvement, no change in employment states could be demonstrated. The use of medical facilities was significantly less, the average number of hospital days per patient declining from 17 to 3.9 and hospitalization decreasing from 1.5 to 0.4. The result was a significant decrease in estimated hospital costs. We conclude that in patients referred for coronary angiography for severe chest pain, documentation of a normal coronary arteriogram significantly alters the clinical assessment of symptoms, improves functional status, modifies medical therapy, and reduces hospitalization and medical costs. These therapeutic and economic benefits deserve consideration in the evaluation of coronary angiography for its overall effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7124777     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(82)90328-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  8 in total

1.  The esophagus as a source of non-cardiac chest pain.

Authors:  M A Craven; W E Waterfall
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Chest pain in patients with normal coronary arteriograms.

Authors:  S Brandon
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-11-19

Review 3.  Headache and Neuroimaging: Why We Continue to Do It.

Authors:  J E Jordan; A E Flanders
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Are investigations anxiolytic or anxiogenic? A randomised controlled trial of neuroimaging to provide reassurance in chronic daily headache.

Authors:  L Howard; S Wessely; M Leese; L Page; P McCrone; K Husain; J Tong; A Dowson
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  The impact of cardiac CT on the appropriate utilization of catheter coronary angiography.

Authors:  Philipp Wagdi; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-11-21       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  Chest pain and angiographically normal coronary arteries. Implications for treatment.

Authors:  V Mukerji; B D Beitman; M A Alpert
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1993

7.  Patients with angina with normal and near normal coronary arteries: clinical and psychosocial state 12 months after angiography.

Authors:  C Bass; C Wade; D Hand; G Jackson
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-11-19

8.  Adverse outcomes among women presenting with signs and symptoms of ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease: findings from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) angiographic core laboratory.

Authors:  Barry Sharaf; Todd Wood; Leslee Shaw; B Delia Johnson; Sheryl Kelsey; R David Anderson; Carl J Pepine; C Noel Bairey Merz
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 4.749

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.