Literature DB >> 7123205

Lead burden in prehistorical, historical and modern human bones.

G A Drasch.   

Abstract

From archaeological findings it is well known that, in the past, lead has been intensively used by man. The toxicological aspects of increased lead exposure are perceived onward from the 2nd century B.C.; between 90 and 95% of the absorbed lead is stored in bone. Therefore measurement of lead levels in ancient bones seemed to be a suitable approach to determine the real body burdens at different periods of time and to compare the results with the present situation. Approximately 650 bones from a total of 332 individuals of the following epochs were analysed: prehistorical Peruvians, prehistorical Teutons, late Romans, Middle Age (further differentiated), present time Germans. The determination of lead was made by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy. The possibilities of postmortem alterations of lead concentrations were thoroughly investigated. For this purpose the dependence of the lead concentrations found were compared with the age, sex, type of bone, conditions of preservation and storage. It is concluded that only the series "prehistorical Teutons" may be exposed to levels which are relevant to postmortem changes. The lead concentration of the group "prehistorical Peruvians" can be taken as the "physiological zero point"; from this culture no use of lead is known. The present body burden for lead in germany is about 20 times greater than this "physiological zero point". In the late Roman epoch, but also in the Middle Age the lead concentrations and body burden was 41-47% of that today. Only at the time after the Barbarian Invasions did this value drop to 13% as a result of a lower living standard. The different sources of lead exposure during Roman times, the Middle Age and today are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7123205     DOI: 10.1016/0048-9697(82)90001-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  9 in total

Review 1.  Lead intoxication--new insights into an old problem.

Authors:  R Nowack; E Ritz
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.714

2.  The urban pigeon (Columba livia, Forma urbana) - A biomonitor for the lead burden of the environment.

Authors:  G A Drasch; D Walser; J Kösters
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Variation of trace metals in ancient and contemporary Japanese bones.

Authors:  A Hisanaga; M Hirata; A Tanaka; N Ishinishi; Y Eguchi
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Lead levels in ancient and contemporary Japanese bones.

Authors:  A Hisanaga; Y Eguchi; M Hirata; N Ishinishi
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  [Kidney function in lead burden].

Authors:  E Ritz; A Wiecek; J Mann
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1986-09-15

Review 6.  The multielemental analysis of bone. A review.

Authors:  H Zwanziger
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Anthropogenic platinum fluxes: Quantification of sources and sinks, and outlook.

Authors:  E Helmers; K Kümmerer
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Is dental amalgam safe for humans? The opinion of the scientific committee of the European Commission.

Authors:  Joachim Mutter
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.646

9.  Cumulative community-level lead exposure and pulse pressure: the normative aging study.

Authors:  Todd Perlstein; Jennifer Weuve; Joel Schwartz; David Sparrow; Robert Wright; Augusto Litonjua; Huiling Nie; Howard Hu
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 9.031

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.