Literature DB >> 7122824

Effects of characteristics of the survey instrument on response rates to a mail survey of community hospitals.

R M Mullner, P S Levy, C S Byre, D Matthews.   

Abstract

A 4-factor, 16-cell experimental design was used to investigate the relationship between response rates of community hospitals to a survey conducted by the American Hospital Association (AHA) and 4 characteristics of the survey instrument, each varied dichotomously: the perceived length of the questionnaire, the order of questions, the orientation of the appeal made in the cover letter, and the presence or absence of a promise to share the results of the study with respondents. Response rate variations between the various cells were examined and multiple logistic regression was used to analyze the significance of the association between response rates and each of the four survey instrument variables while controlling for the effect of the others. At the same time, control was also maintained for the effects of five institutional characteristics of hospitals which a previous study had shown to have a significant relationship to response: bed size, location within or outside a standard metropolitan statistical area, AHA membership status, type of ownership, and form of control. The perceived length of the questionnaire and the order of questions were found to have a significant effect on response rates, but the orientation of the cover letter and a promise to share the results of the study with the respondents were found to be insignificant.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7122824      PMCID: PMC1424368     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  1 in total

1.  An investigation of institutional characteristics associated with response rates in mail surveys of community hospitals.

Authors:  R Mullner; P S Levy; D Matthews; C S Byre
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1981 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

  1 in total
  6 in total

1.  Does flattery work? A comparison of 2 different cover letters for an international survey of orthopedic surgeons.

Authors:  Pam Leece; Mohit Bhandari; Sheila Sprague; Marc F Swiontkowski; Emil H Schemitsch; Paul Tornetta
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Increasing response rates in physicians' mail surveys: an experimental study.

Authors:  B Maheux; C Legault; J Lambert
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Offering results to participants in a diabetes survey: effects on survey response rates.

Authors:  Jeanette Y Ziegenfuss; Nilay D Shah; James R Deming; Holly K Van Houten; Steven A Smith; Timothy J Beebe
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  A randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of offering study results as an incentive to increase response rates to postal questionnaires [ISRCTN26118436].

Authors:  Sarah Cockayne; David J Torgerson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  A photograph of the researcher on the invitation letter did not affect the participation rate of a postal survey: a randomized study within a trial (SWAT).

Authors:  Barbara Prediger; Nadja Könsgen; Ana-Mihaela Bora; Anna Schlimbach; Dawid Pieper
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 4.612

Review 6.  Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.

Authors:  Philip James Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike J Clarke; Carolyn Diguiseppi; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan; Rachel Cooper; Lambert M Felix; Sarah Pratap
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.