Literature DB >> 7119993

Biological comparisons between a laboratory-maintained and a recently isolated field strain of Boophilus microplus.

N P Stewart, L L Callow, F Duncalfe.   

Abstract

Biological differences between two strains of Boophilus microplus were examined. The A-strain of ticks had been maintained at the laboratory for many years and the N-strain was recently isolated, being a composite strain derived from ticks from different sources in the field. In three experiments, up to three times as many N-strain ticks grew to maturity than did A-strain ticks, although A-strain ticks matured earlier. N-strain ticks were 17 to 60% heavier, and laid 50 to 100% more eggs than A-strain ticks. N-strain eggs were significantly more fertile than A-strain eggs. Unfed, N-strain larvae survived much longer than A-strain larvae. The reduced vitality of the A-strain is attributed to its long history in the laboratory during which time it has become biologically disadvantaged through inbreeding. These results suggest that some laboratory-maintained strains of ticks may be unsuitable for ecological or acaricide studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7119993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Parasitol        ISSN: 0022-3395            Impact factor:   1.276


  17 in total

1.  Prediction of G protein-coupled receptor encoding sequences from the synganglion transcriptome of the cattle tick, Rhipicephalus microplus.

Authors:  Felix D Guerrero; Anastasia Kellogg; Alexandria N Ogrey; Andrew M Heekin; Roberto Barrero; Matthew I Bellgard; Scot E Dowd; Ming-Ying Leung
Journal:  Ticks Tick Borne Dis       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.744

2.  Hereford cattle protected against Boophilus microplus with antigens purified by immunoaffinity chromatography from larval and adult ticks.

Authors:  J P Opdebeeck; J Y Wong; C Dobson
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.397

Review 3.  Manual for maintenance of multi-host ixodid ticks in the laboratory.

Authors:  Michael L Levin; Lauren B M Schumacher
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 2.132

4.  Boophilus microplus (ixodid tick): fine structure of the gut basophilic cell in relation to water and ion transport.

Authors:  R I Agbede; D H Kemp
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 2.132

5.  Vaccines to protect Hereford cattle against the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus.

Authors:  J P Opdebeeck; J Y Wong; L A Jackson; C Dobson
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 7.397

6.  The effect of antigen concentration and vaccine regimen on the immunity induced by membrane antigens from the midgut of Boophilus microplus.

Authors:  L A Jackson; J P Opdebeeck
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 7.397

7.  Protective efficacy of antigens solubilized from gut membranes of the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus.

Authors:  J Y Wong; J P Opdebeeck
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 7.397

8.  Immunological profiles of Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle infested with the cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus.

Authors:  Emily K Piper; Nicholas N Jonsson; Cedric Gondro; Ala E Lew-Tabor; Paula Moolhuijzen; Megan E Vance; Louise A Jackson
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2009-05-27

9.  Biology of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus and R. zambeziensis and production of a fertile hybrid under laboratory conditions.

Authors:  D Zivkovic; R G Pegram; F Jongejan; E T Mwase
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 2.132

10.  Evidence of a tick RNAi pathway by comparative genomics and reverse genetics screen of targets with known loss-of-function phenotypes in Drosophila.

Authors:  Sebastian Kurscheid; Ala E Lew-Tabor; Manuel Rodriguez Valle; Anthea G Bruyeres; Vivienne J Doogan; Ulrike G Munderloh; Felix D Guerrero; Roberto A Barrero; Matthew I Bellgard
Journal:  BMC Mol Biol       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 2.946

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.