Literature DB >> 711990

Frequency discrimination in the chinchilla.

D A Nelson, T E Kiester.   

Abstract

Chinchillas were trained with shock-avoidance procedures to discriminate or detect pure-tone frequency differences. Inital attempts at determining frequency-difference thresholds utilized a complex discrimination paradigm and a go-no-go response. Although discriminations of large frequency differences were obtained from chinchillas after considerable training, discriminations of small frequency differences could not be trained. Therefore, determinations of frequency-difference thresholds could not be made with the complex discrimination paradigm and the go-no-go response task. A simple detection paradigm, involving the detection of frequency alternation in an ongoing train of tone bursts proved to be a more successful technique. Frequency-alternation detection was quickly learned by six chinchillas, and frequency-difference thresholds were obtained with an adaptive sequential procedure. Psychometric functions were reconstructed from the threshold tracking data of chinchillas, and comparisons were made with differential frequency thresholds from cats and humans obtained by previous investigators. Differential frequency thresholds from chinchillas paralleled those from cats and were about twice as large. Differential frequency thresholds from humans were considerably smaller than from chinchillas, especially for low-frequency tones. When a constant detectability index was used to specify differential frequency sensitiviy in chinchillas, chinchilla and human differential sensitivity functions paralleled one another. Human differential sensitivity was about ten times better than that of the chinchilla.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 711990     DOI: 10.1121/1.381977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  6 in total

1.  A maximum-likelihood procedure for estimating psychometric functions: thresholds, slopes, and lapses of attention.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Complex pitch perception mechanisms are shared by humans and a New World monkey.

Authors:  Xindong Song; Michael S Osmanski; Yueqi Guo; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Behavioral measures of auditory streaming in ferrets (Mustela putorius).

Authors:  Ling Ma; Christophe Micheyl; Pingbo Yin; Andrew J Oxenham; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.231

4.  Pitch discrimination by ferrets for simple and complex sounds.

Authors:  Kerry M M Walker; Jan W H Schnupp; Sheelah M B Hart-Schnupp; Andrew J King; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Frequency discrimination and stimulus deviance in the inferior colliculus and cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Yaneri A Ayala; David Pérez-González; Daniel Duque; Israel Nelken; Manuel S Malmierca
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.492

6.  The chinchilla animal model for hearing science and noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Monica Trevino; Edward Lobarinas; Amanda C Maulden; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.