Literature DB >> 7119193

Problems and pitfalls in the evaluation of thoracic aortic dissection by computed tomography.

J D Godwin, R S Breiman, J M Speckman.   

Abstract

Several conditions can lead to either false positive or false negative diagnoses of aortic dissection by computed tomography (CT) with intravenous administration of contrast medium. Insufficient contrast enhancement may cause intimal flaps to be missed, leading to a false negative diagnosis. False positive diagnoses result when extraaortic structures (e.g., mediastinal veins, pericardium, thickened pleura, and lung) are mistaken for false channels in the aorta. Superimposition of structures in thick CT slices may cause intimal calcifications to appear displaced. Streak artifacts across the descending aorta can resemble double aortic channels or intimal flaps. Fusiform aneurysms with thrombus are often hard to distinguish from thrombosed dissections by CT as well as by aortography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7119193     DOI: 10.1097/00004728-198208000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  9 in total

1.  Virtual versus true non-contrast dual-energy CT imaging for the diagnosis of aortic intramural hematoma.

Authors:  Salim Si-Mohamed; Nicolas Dupuis; Valérie Tatard-Leitman; David Rotzinger; Sara Boccalini; Matthias Dion; Alain Vlassenbroek; Philippe Coulon; Yoad Yagil; Nadav Shapira; Philippe Douek; Loic Boussel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Aortic dissection following coronary artery bypass surgery: diagnosis by CT.

Authors:  A G Archer; P L Choyke; R K Zeman; C E Green; M Zuckerman
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Aortic dissection, a diagnostic dilemma: case report.

Authors:  G C Liu; H R Shah; B Sharma; J E Reifsteck; E J Ferris
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  [Postoperative results and follow-up of thoracic aortic diseases using magnetic resonance tomography].

Authors:  J Ennker; C Schubert; R Schneider; R Felix; R Hetzer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1989

Review 5.  Imaging findings of acute intravascular thrombus on non-enhanced computed tomography.

Authors:  Ryan T Whitesell; Scott D Steenburg
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-03-21

6.  Radiological evaluation of the ascending aorta following repair of type A dissection.

Authors:  J Slavotinek; S W Kendall; C D Flower; A K Dixon; F C Wells; S R Large
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  A low threshold to ECG-gated repeat CTA reduces the risk of false-positive diagnosis of type A dissection in interhospital referrals: a case series study.

Authors:  Angela Kornberger; Iris Burck; Hazem El Beyrouti; Nancy Halloum; Andres Beiras-Fernandez; Christian-Friedrich Vahl
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  False positive computed tomographic angiography for Stanford type A aortic dissection.

Authors:  Murad F Bandali; Muhammed A Hatem; Jehangir J Appoo; Stuart J Hutchison; Jason K Wong
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2015-08-29

9.  Prediction of Intimal Tear Site by Computed Tomography in Acute Aortic Dissection Type A.

Authors:  Jun Sung Kim; Kay-Hyun Park; Cheong Lim; Dong Jin Kim; Yochun Jung; Yoon Cheol Shin; Sang Il Choi; Eun Ju Chun; Jin Young Yoo
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.243

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.