Literature DB >> 7114635

Treatment of infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

C Watanakunakorn.   

Abstract

Strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus are resistant to other penicillins. The in-vitro susceptibility to the cephalosporins differs among strains. Some strains, susceptible to cephalosporins by the standard disk susceptibility test, are proved resistant by the quantitative dilution test; they may show pop-up colonies within the zone of inhibition when incubated further at room temperature. The clinical efficacy of the cephalosporins with or without an aminoglycoside in treating infections due to methicillin-resistant S. aureus is in doubt. To date, susceptible to vancomycin. In-vitro antagonism of vancomycin and rifampin against S. aureus has been shown. Thus, vancomycin alone appears to be the treatment of choice; if this treatment fails, aminoglycoside or rifampin should be added. Serum bactericidal titers should be carefully monitored before and after the addition of the new agent and in-vitro time-kill studies of combination of antibiotics done if feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7114635     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-97-3-376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  37 in total

Review 1.  Antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus aureus: genetic basis.

Authors:  B R Lyon; R Skurray
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1987-03

Review 2.  Methicillin-resistant staphylococci: detection methods and treatment of infections.

Authors:  C J Hackbarth; H F Chambers
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  In vitro comparison of A-56619, A-56620, amifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, enoxacin, norfloxacin, and ofloxacin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  S M Smith
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Clinical experience of cefotaxime in infections caused by gram-positive pathogens.

Authors:  D Bassetti; M Solbiati; G Fraizzoli
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.553

5.  Comparison of test systems for recognition of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  R P Mouton; S L Mulders; J de Knijff; J Hermans
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Clindamycin for colonization and infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  S M Smith; A Mangia; R H Eng; P Ruggeri; A Cytryn; F Tecson-Tumang
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.553

7.  Resistance to methicillin and virulence of Staphylococcus aureus strains in bacteriemic cancer patients.

Authors:  L Marty; A Flahault; B Suarez; J Caillon; C Hill; A Andremont
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  In vitro evaluation of HR810, a new wide-spectrum aminothiazolyl alpha-methoxyimino cephalosporin.

Authors:  R N Jones; C Thornsberry; A L Barry
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Oral rifampin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole therapy in asymptomatic carriers of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections.

Authors:  R T Ellison; F N Judson; L C Peterson; D L Cohn; J M Ehret
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1984-05

10.  Emergence of quinolone resistance among clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  N Harnett; S Brown; C Krishnan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.