Literature DB >> 710961

Lundh test and ERCP in pancreatic disease.

M G Ashton, A T Axon, D J Lintott.   

Abstract

The Lundh test and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) were used to investigate 40 patients with known or suspected pancreatic disease. Pancreatograms were classified as being normal or showing minimal or gross changes. There was good correlation between the two tests in assessing the degree of pancreatic disease (P less than 0.01). Gross radiographic changes were associated with a mean tryptic activity (MTA) of less than 6 IU/ml, while minimal changes were associated with an MTA between 6 and 14 IU/ml. Although some patients with normal pancreatograms had MTAs within this range, no patients with an MTA above 14 IU/ml had an abnormal pancreatogram. The Lundh meal is of great value in detecting extensive pancreatic disease and an unequivocally normal result virtually excludes significant chronic pancreatic disease. Values in the equivocal range usefully draw attention to early pancreatitis which may be confirmed by ERCP. In this paper the interpretation of pancreatograms is discussed and the clinical features of the patients with minimal change disease are reviewed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 710961      PMCID: PMC1412364          DOI: 10.1136/gut.19.10.910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  13 in total

1.  Pancreatic exocrine function in neoplastic and inflammatory disease; a simple and reliable new test.

Authors:  G LUNDH
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1962-03       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Gastric pseudolesion simulating neoplasm due to splenic anomaly.

Authors:  A Newman
Journal:  Ariz Med       Date:  1977-06

Review 3.  ERCP.

Authors:  P B Cotton
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  The Lundh test.

Authors:  O James
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Manometric endoscopic retrograde pancreatocholangiography. Technique, significance, and evaluation.

Authors:  T Kasugai; N Kuno; M Kizu
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1974-06

6.  Comparative diagnostic value of endoscopic pancreatography and pancreatic function tests.

Authors:  S Nakano; Y Horigauchi; T Takeda; T Suzuki; S Nakajima
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  The Lundh test in the diagnosis of pancreatic disease: a review of five years' experience.

Authors:  A Mottaleb; F Kapp; E C Noguera; T D Kellock; H S Wiggins; S L Waller
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Comparative study of secretin and Lundh tests.

Authors:  K Gyr; N M Agrawal; O Felsenfeld; R G Font
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1975-06

9.  Factors influencing duodenal trypsin levels following a standard test meal as a test of pancreatic function.

Authors:  I J Zeitlin; W Sircus
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of the pancreatic ducts in chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  K Nakamura; H Sarles; H Payan
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  9 in total

1.  Tests of pancreatic function.

Authors:  J H Meyer
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1981-11

Review 2.  Laboratory tests in the diagnosis of the chronic pancreatic diseases. Part 2. Tests of pancreatic secretion.

Authors:  E J Boyd; K G Wormsley
Journal:  Int J Pancreatol       Date:  1987-08

3.  Prospective comparison of three non-invasive tests for pancreatic disease.

Authors:  I Cobden; R Lendrum; O F James; C W Venables; I Tarbit; T Hawkins
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-09-29

Review 4.  Laboratory tests in the diagnosis of the chronic pancreatic diseases. Part 7. Comparison between function tests and morphological investigation in the diagnosis of pancreatic disease.

Authors:  E J Boyd; H Rinderknecht; K G Wormsley
Journal:  Int J Pancreatol       Date:  1988-07

5.  Prospective comparison of three non-invasive tests for pancreatic disease.

Authors:  P N Foster; C J Mitchell; D R Robertson; I Hamilton; H Irving; J Kelleher; D J Lintott; P J Robinson; A T Axon; M S Losowsky
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-07-07

6.  Postcholecystectomy syndrome in northern India--study on the diagnostic and therapeutic role of ERCP.

Authors:  J B Dilawari; Y K Chawla; A K Singhal; S Kataria
Journal:  Gastroenterol Jpn       Date:  1990-06

7.  Comparison of the oral (PABA) pancreatic function test, the secretin-pancreozymin test and endoscopic retrograde pancreatography in chronic alcohol induced pancreatitis.

Authors:  A S Mee; A H Girdwood; E Walker; N H Gilinsky; R E Kottler; I N Marks
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Clinical relevance of an unfused pancreatic duct system.

Authors:  C J Mitchell; D J Lintott; W S Ruddell; M S Losowsky; A T Axon
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Comparison of pancreatic morphology and exocrine functional impairment in patients with chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  T Bozkurt; U Braun; S Leferink; G Gilly; G Lux
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 23.059

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.