Literature DB >> 7105580

Mechanisms of lytic and blastic metastatic disease of bone.

C S Galasko.   

Abstract

In the majority of skeletal metastases, new bone develops simultaneously with bone destruction. The roentgenogram indicates the net effect of these two processes. Where the bone formation predominates, the lesion appears sclerotic. Where bone destruction predominates, it appears lytic. Mixed lesions may also occur. There are two main mechanisms for the new bone formation. Those tumors associated with a suitable fibrous stroma develop islands of intramembranous ossification within the stroma, e.g., metastases from prostatic carcinoma. In the vast majority of metastases bone destruction is associated with reactive new bone formation. The latter is similar to callus associated with fracture repair. Myelomata and lymphomata are not associated with this reactive new bone formation. There are at least two main mechanisms for the bone destruction. The earlier and quantitatively more important phase is mediated via osteoclasts, neoplasms secreting a variety of osteoclast stimulating factors. The main humoral factor in myeloma and the lymphomata is probably osteoclast activating factor (OAF), whereas in the carcinomata it may be prostaglandin. Two thirds of human mammary carcinomata are osteolytically active in vitro. In a co-culture model, the osteolysis can be significantly reduced by prostaglandin inhibitors, diphosphonates and particularly, their combination. At a late stage, neoplastic or monocytic cells are directly responsible for the continuing bone destruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7105580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  22 in total

Review 1.  Animal models of bone metastasis.

Authors:  Thomas J Rosol; Sarah H Tannehill-Gregg; Stephanie Corn; Abraham Schneider; Laurie K McCauley
Journal:  Cancer Treat Res       Date:  2004

2.  Bisphosphonates inhibit the adhesion of breast cancer cells to bone matrices in vitro.

Authors:  G van der Pluijm; H Vloedgraven; E van Beek; L van der Wee-Pals; C Löwik; S Papapoulos
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Metastatic breast cancer cells suppress osteoblast adhesion and differentiation.

Authors:  Robyn R Mercer; Chiaki Miyasaka; Andrea M Mastro
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.150

4.  Ex-vivo analysis of the bone microenvironment in bone metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Karen M Bussard; Andrea M Mastro
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 2.673

5.  Three-dimensional trabecular bone architecture of the lumbar spine in bone metastasis from prostate cancer: comparison with degenerative sclerosis.

Authors:  Tsutomu Tamada; Teruki Sone; Yoshimasa Jo; Shigeki Imai; Yasumasa Kajihara; Masao Fukunaga
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Radionuclide Therapy of Bone Metastases.

Authors:  Manfred Fischer; Willm U Kampen
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 7.  Strategies for management of prostate cancer-related bone pain.

Authors:  R C Pelger; V Soerdjbalie-Maikoe; N A Hamdy
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.923

8.  Pain caused by bone metastasis in endocrine-therapy-refractory prostate cancer.

Authors:  K Akakura; S Akimoto; J Shimazaki
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Inhibition of prostate cancer osteoblastic progression with VEGF121/rGel, a single agent targeting osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and tumor neovasculature.

Authors:  Khalid A Mohamedali; Zhi Gang Li; Michael W Starbuck; Xinhai Wan; Jun Yang; Sehoon Kim; Wendy Zhang; Michael G Rosenblum; Nora M Navone
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Pitfalls of FDG-PET for the diagnosis of osteoblastic bone metastases in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Takako Nakai; Chio Okuyama; Takao Kubota; Kei Yamada; Yo Ushijima; Keiko Taniike; Takako Suzuki; Tsunehiko Nishimura
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-08-20       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.