Literature DB >> 7102813

A comparison of clinical refractive data obtained by three examiners.

J Perrigin, D Perrigin, T Grosvenor.   

Abstract

Clinical refractive data were obtained on 32 subjects by each of three examiners, each examiner using standard subjective refraction procedures with an endpoint criterion of "maximum plus for best visual acuity." The results of the three examiners were compared in terms of spherical equivalent refraction, spherical power, cylinder power, cylinder axis, and anisometropia. In addition, results were compared to those of previous studies involving both clinical refraction and the American Optical Corporation's SR III Subjective Refraction System.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7102813     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-198206000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0093-7002


  3 in total

1.  Is an objective refraction optimised using the visual Strehl ratio better than a subjective refraction?

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Jason D Marsack; Lan Chi Nguyen; Han Cheng; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Comparison of refractive assessment by wavefront aberrometry, autorefraction, and subjective refraction.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Bennett; Gina M Stalboerger; David O Hodge; Muriel M Schornack
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-12-11

3.  Image Quality Metric Derived Refractions Predicted to Improve Visual Acuity Beyond Habitual Refraction for Patients With Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Julia S Benoit; Jason D Marsack; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.283

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.