Literature DB >> 7099052

A factor analytic study of teaching in off-campus general practice clerkships.

S Shellenberger, J M Mahan.   

Abstract

The Preceptor-evaluation questionnaire (PEQ) was developed at the University of Mississippi Medical Center to evaluate the clinical teaching behavior of general practice doctors in private practice who have one or more third-year medical students per year in their offices for a required general practice clerkship. The PEQ was designed to provide feedback to these doctors and the sponsoring department in an effort to improve teaching in this setting. Developed from the input of family practice doctors who have supervised students in their offices and from a review of related literature, the instrument was given to students to determine the level of importance they attributed to each teaching characteristic. A principle components factor analysis and subsequent varimax rotation produced six significant teaching factors in this setting. These six factors were: (1) demonstrates a humanistic orientation toward patients and staff; (2) demonstrates a humanistic orientation toward student; (3) provides opportunity for practice; (4) motivates and stimulates student's thinking; (5)communicates effectively with student; and (6) demonstrates comfort and confidence in the roles of doctor and teacher. The factor relating to the humanistic orientation toward student has not appeared as a separate factor in other studies of clinical teaching. This may be due to the unique aspects of the relationship between student and doctor in this setting which may not occur in other settings. The PEQ and similar reliable and valid instruments can provide valuable information for the doctors in these off-campus teaching situations as well as provide useful programme planning information for the sponsoring academic departments. This information may also be valuable for off-campus residency training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7099052     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1982.tb01076.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  6 in total

Review 1.  How reliable are assessments of clinical teaching? A review of the published instruments.

Authors:  Thomas J Beckman; Amit K Ghosh; David A Cook; Patricia J Erwin; Jayawant N Mandrekar
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Establishment of a community-based residency training program.

Authors:  C B Whiteside; M F Longhurst
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 3.  What is the validity evidence for assessments of clinical teaching?

Authors:  Thomas J Beckman; David A Cook; Jayawant N Mandrekar
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Faculty development for ambulatory teaching.

Authors:  L Wilkerson; E Armstrong; L Lesky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Assessing the quality of clinical teachers: a systematic review of content and quality of questionnaires for assessing clinical teachers.

Authors:  Cornelia R M G Fluit; Sanneke Bolhuis; Richard Grol; Roland Laan; Michel Wensing
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  Confounding factors in using upward feedback to assess the quality of medical training: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anli Yue Zhou; Paul Baker
Journal:  J Educ Eval Health Prof       Date:  2014-08-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.