Literature DB >> 7096705

Measurement of trabecular bone mineral by dual energy computed tomography.

J E Adams, S Z Chen, P H Adams, I Isherwood.   

Abstract

An investigation into the possible effect of fat on the estimation of trabecular bone mineral concentration by computed tomography (CT) is described. Computed tomographic attenuation and effective atomic number were measured in models simulating trabecular bone, and in cadaveric femoral using a simultaneous dual energy technique. The composition of the area of bone scanned was measured by chemical analysis. In the bone models, CT attenuation value and effective atomic number were positively correlated to the calcium concentration; fat modified CT attenuation value but not atomic number. The calcium concentration of the trabecular bone samples was positively correlated with effective atomic number (r = 0.972; p less than 0.001) and to a lesser extent with CT attenuation value (r = 0.67; p less than 0.01), but both relations were independent of fat. Under the conditions of these experiments, the determination of effective atomic number by dual energy CT provides a more accurate measure of trabecular bone mineral concentration than does CT attenuation value by a single energy technique. There was a considerable spatial variation in the amount of bone tissue in the trabecular bone space, and CT attenuation values varied with the site and size of the area of interest. Accurate registration is essential for the precise measurement of trabecular bone mineral by CT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7096705     DOI: 10.1097/00004728-198206000-00028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  13 in total

Review 1.  Using diagnostic radiology in human evolutionary studies.

Authors:  F Spoor; N Jeffery; F Zonneveld
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 2.  Standardising measurement of tumour vascularity by imaging: recommendations for ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Adrian K Dixon; Fiona J Gilbert
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Accuracy of vertebral mineral determination by dual-energy quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  W D Reinbold; C P Adler; W A Kalender; R Lente
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  The determination of bone fracture properties by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and single-photon absorptiometry: a comparative study.

Authors:  M D Markel; M A Wikenheiser; R L Morin; D G Lewallen; E Y Chao
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Bone density distribution within the femoral head and neck. An examination by high-resolution computed tomography.

Authors:  R E Field; A K Dixon; J P Lawrence; N Rushton
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Marrow Adipose Tissue Quantification of the Lumbar Spine by Using Dual-Energy CT and Single-Voxel (1)H MR Spectroscopy: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Miriam A Bredella; Scott M Daley; Mannudeep K Kalra; J Keenan Brown; Karen K Miller; Martin Torriani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Computed tomography-osteoabsorptiometry for assessing the density distribution of subchondral bone as a measure of long-term mechanical adaptation in individual joints.

Authors:  M Müller-Gerbl; R Putz; N Hodapp; E Schulte; B Wimmer
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  The use of routine non density calibrated clinical computed tomography data as a potentially useful screening tool for identifying patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Christopher John Burke; Manjiri M Didolkar; Huiman X Barnhart; Emily N Vinson
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2016-10-05

Review 9.  Opportunities for new CT contrast agents to maximize the diagnostic potential of emerging spectral CT technologies.

Authors:  Benjamin M Yeh; Paul F FitzGerald; Peter M Edic; Jack W Lambert; Robert E Colborn; Michael E Marino; Paul M Evans; Jeannette C Roberts; Zhen J Wang; Margaret J Wong; Peter J Bonitatibus
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 15.470

10.  Specimen size and porosity can introduce error into microCT-based tissue mineral density measurements.

Authors:  Roberto J Fajardo; Esther Cory; Nipun D Patel; Ara Nazarian; Andres Laib; Rajaram K Manoharan; James E Schmitz; Jeremy M DeSilva; Laura M MacLatchy; Brian D Snyder; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.