Literature DB >> 7095899

Colony growth and chemosensitivity in vitro of human melanoma biopsies. Relationship to clinical parameters.

K M Tveit, O Fodstad, J Lotsberg, S Vaage, A Pihl.   

Abstract

To study the usefulness of an in vitro colony-forming assay in predicting individual clinical responses to chemotherapy, tumor cells obtained from 150 melanoma metastases (119 patients) were grown in soft agar according to the method of Courtenay and Mills (1978), and tested for sensitivity to DTIC, CCNU, vinblastine, procarbazine, abrin and ricin. In 83% of the cases colony formation was observed (plating efficiency, PE, greater than 0.01%). Twenty-seven per cent of the tumors gave PEs greater than 1%, 45% gave PEs in the range 0.1-0.9%, whereas 11% of the tumors gave 0.01-0.09%. The PEs were not correlated with the degree of pigmentation or with the clinical course. Evaluable chemosensitivity data were obtained on 104 metastases from 83 patients. Large differences in sensitivity were seen. In cases which were evaluable both in vivo and in vitro a clear correlation was found between the in vitro chemosensitivity, expressed as the expected growth delay, and the clinical response to chemotherapy. Tumors from patients with partial response, mixed response or stable disease after prior progression, all had rather high in vitro sensitivity to the drug used (expected growth delay greater than 2.0), whereas patients with progression had lower sensitivity. The results confirm that the soft agar method used here provides good culture conditions for human melanoma cells and show that chemosensitivity data can be obtained in a high percentage of melanoma patients. The approach used seems promising in aiding clinicians to adjust chemotherapy to individual patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7095899     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910290508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  13 in total

Review 1.  Human tumor cloning assays: applications in clinical oncology and new antineoplastic agent development.

Authors:  D D von Hoff
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 9.264

2.  A new technique to register proliferation of clonogenic cells from brain tumors.

Authors:  G Unsgaard; B Larsen; A Dalen; R Vik; R Ringkjøb
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 3.  Murine models to evaluate novel and conventional therapeutic strategies for cancer.

Authors:  James E Talmadge; Rakesh K Singh; Isaiah J Fidler; Avraham Raz
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 4.  The human tumor colony-forming chemosensitivity assay: a biological and clinical review.

Authors:  E C Bradley; B F Issell; R Hellman
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 5.  Predictive testing in cancer chemotherapy. II. In vitro.

Authors:  P H Slee; A T Van Oosterom; E A De Bruijn
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1985-08-23

Review 6.  Prediction of response to drug therapy of cancer. A review of in vitro assays.

Authors:  W T Bellamy
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Cooperative evaluation of human tumor chemosensitivity in the soft-agar assay and its clinical correlations.

Authors:  D Fan; L R Morgan; C Schneider; H Blank; S Fan
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Predictive chemosensitivity testing in malignant melanoma: reliable methodology--ineffective drugs.

Authors:  K M Tveit; S Gundersen; J Høie; A Pihl
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Selection of tumour cell subpopulations occurs during cultivation of human tumours in soft agar. A DNA flow cytometric study.

Authors:  K M Tveit; E O Pettersen; S D Fosså; A Pihl
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Chemosensitivity measurements of human tumour cells by soft agar assays are influenced by the culture conditions.

Authors:  L Endresen; K M Tveit; H E Rugstad; A Pihl
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.