Literature DB >> 7091928

Selective surgical management of penetrating neck trauma. 15-year experience in a community hospital.

H V Cabasares.   

Abstract

The management of penetrating neck trauma continues to generate disagreement in the surgical literature. Current publications of the subject advocate selective surgical intervention only if facilities and manpower are adequate. This review of a 15-year experience in the setting of a community hospital shows unquestionably that if surgeons with clinical experience evaluate this type of trauma, more than 50 per cent of patients are spared necessary operations. On the other hand, if patients are selected to undergo surgery because of strong clinical indications and the decision is carried out promptly, unnecessary and costly diagnostic studies are avoided. By following this policy of selective surgical management, our mortality rate of 3 per cent compares favorably with reports in the literature. No increased morbidity was noted in those patients managed nonoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7091928

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  4 in total

1.  Panendoscopy with arteriography versus mandatory exploration of penetrating wounds of the neck.

Authors:  L D Noyes; N E McSwain; I P Markowitz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Penetrating injuries of the neck.

Authors:  D Demetriades; M Stewart
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Imaging assessment of penetrating injury of the neck and face.

Authors:  Curtis Offiah; Edward Hall
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2012-09-04

4.  [Prognostic factors of penetrating neck trauma].

Authors:  José Cruvinel Neto; Rogério Aparecido Dedivitis
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.